Live data from Hacker News

The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

orchidfiles.com

141–150 of 238 posts

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#141

You may have a cool product in the field of sports betting, casinos, or lotteries. But almost all social networks and search engines won’t let you advertise without a license from the required jurisdiction. Good . You should face social stigma for creating products that literally ruin people's lives.

So, incoming ban on ads for AI, cars, fast food and shoes?

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#142
I used to know a bondage model and porn producer in San Francisco. She was quite open about it, and it didn't seem to hurt her reputation. Her operation was fully compliant, with 18 U.S. Code § 2257 forms on file for all performers. And yes, law enforcement did come by to check. One day we were talking and I asked about credit card processing. I got a twenty minute rant about the problems of offshore credit card processing, ripoffs in the 7 figure range, arbitrary cancellation... That was the hardest part of the business, and the most frustrating.

She finally gave it up, moved to Texas, and now manages influencer networks.

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#143
post #3

What's the author trying to say here? It's good that the law isn't the only line between good and evil. A bit of stigma is a bottom-up way for people to shape society. If nobody invites you to dinner parties because you run a startup that combines payday-lending and day-trading, that's a good thing. It's free alpha for companies doing more worthwhile things.

> a startup that combines payday-lending and day-trading

Add in crypto and some AI, and there’s a $50m funding round waiting for you.

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#144
Generally speaking I am a classical liberal in that I believe "vices" like drugs, pornography, prostitution should be legal in order to be regulated and in the open. It cannot eliminate abuse but it can help mitigate it.

What I would LOVE to see in the United States in particular is a system where we tax pornography and then plow that money back into sex education in public schools. The state of sex education in the United States is so far beyond a joke it is a travesty.

That said, I also feel a lot of folks who are pro-legislation are quite dishonest about the negative side-effects of legalization. They definitely exist!

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#145
Do you all want to know a fun fact about adult-content startups:

Why do you think Onlyfans is the reigning platform for what it does.

Not because it's technically superior, or has the best advertising, or any other logical reason you might summon.

It's because they have a sweetheart deal with a payment processor (Stripe).

I put some time into seriously investigating what it'd take to get an adult-content platform off of the ground, here is one of the emails I received from a self-advertised "high-risk processor":

  > "Yes, we do have some Payment Facilitator solutions. However, none of these processors will accept Adult content."
Nobody will touch it with a 10 foot pole. It's absolute bullshit and is ripe for disruption.

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#146
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While the porn industry has issue, at its core it isn't constructed to extract money from you. Boiling Gambling down to just being "entertainment" is a bit too reductionist in my opinion.

> While the porn industry has issue, at its core it isn't constructed to extract money from you. For what purpose do you think that industry was indirectly created for, if not to make money from people? Even if it might not have been created with that intent (although I'd still argue it was), today it surely is mainly driven and maintain with the (at least) implicit purpose of extracting money from people, that's lit…

Like others have said, any industry has the purpose of extracting money from the customers.

The original poster has not expressed this correctly, but I assume that the intention was to say that the gambling industry is different from all other industries, not because it extracts money like any other industry, but because it does not return a product or service for that money.

The porn industry is no different from any other entertainment industry and it provides a service for money.

Gambling does not really provide any service, it just exploits the hope of the gamblers that they might gain something by gambling, which at least on average, never happens.

I do not think that one can call the stimulation of this hope of gaining as entertainment. There are some gamblers for which gambling is really entertainment, i.e. they are rich and they do not seriously expect to gain anything, but the majority of the gamblers do not do this to be entertained but because of the irrational hope of gaining enough to solve all their problems.

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#147
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't like mixing of everything 18+ in the article. I think the author wants to put all the stigma in one basket, and I don't it's as simple. For example, porn meets some actual human needs and has a certain function - but gambling? Simple abuse at scale. I think like you argue, society shaping business is good. And some people should really reevaluate what they're going for if that's too much for them.

> For example, porn meets some actual human needs and has a certain function - but gambling? Simple abuse at scale. Now I'm as as free-minded as people typically gets, but both of those are just "entertainment" for me, one is not more "essential" than the other, what exact "human need" does pornography meet that somehow gambling doesn't also meet, since we're not talking about "fun" or "entertainment" here but someth…

[deleted]

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#148
This article manages to completely fail to mention one of the primary reasons why credit card processors won't touch porn sites. Not because it's porn, but from a strictly financial risk analysis POV, because a significant portion of the successful charges to cards are later disputed by the cardholder. Some person signs up for a $30 per month whatever porno subscription, and then doesn't understand what they agreed to later on, or regrets it, or their spouse or partner finds the charge on their credit card statement, doesn't know what it is, and starts a dispute with the card issuer.

Compared to something else that sells a tangible good on the internet, or some ordinary software as a service thing... If you have 10,000 charges to 10,000 different people placed from an ordinary merchant, and you compare that to 10,000 charges from a porno website, there will be a vastly larger number of chargebacks and human-caused fraud disputes with the porno website. It's a continual and ongoing pain in the ass for any credit card processor that does business with such a merchant.

The major processors (stripe and its top competitors) have decided that it is not worth the hassle and are completely happy to cede this niche market to specialists. Basically for the same reason that a car loan through a subprime lending company originated by a "buy here pay here" car sales lot will have a much higher percentage interest rate, because of the risk to the lender, credit card processing for the adult entertainment market will have a much higher percentage fee charged to the merchant to run those cards.

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, you also can't advertise illegal drugs either. Doesn't seem to curb demand though. It may actually be more beneficial to allow these things more broadly, because then social safety features can be wedged in between consumers and suppliers more easily and they don't have to deal with a gigantic shadow market that already gets stigmatised to death by the rest of the population. Just accept that a certain percen…

> then social safety features can be wedged in The bans and strict regulations are the social safety features.

If gambling is legal but using violence against debtors is illegal then the legal casinos out-compete the illegal ones but cut you off when the banks won't extend you any more credit instead of giving you a loan with a lien against your kneecaps, and the money goes to companies that aren't using it to fund the expansion of protection rackets etc.

If gambling is illegal then the profits go to organized crime and they don't follow any of the other laws either.

Re: The operating cost of adult and gambling startups

#150
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So true. I wish alcohol, tobacco, gun and insurance companies and their employees faced the same stigma.

One of these things is not like the others. Insurance is a tool for spreading risk, and modern society could not operate without it.

I think to read the comment in best possible interpretation- they meant private health insurance in the USA.
Post reply on HN