Live data from Hacker News

Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?

newyorker.com

141–150 of 1001 posts

Re: Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?

#141
post #30

Ronan Farrow here. Andrew Marantz and I spent 18 months on this investigation. Happy to answer questions about the reporting.

Thank you for coming on HN and offering to answer questions.[a] This is a fantastic piece, very timely, evidently well-researched, and also well-written. Judging by the little that I know, it's accurate. Thank you for doing the work and sharing it with the world. OpenAI may be in a more tenuous competitive position than many people realize. Recent anecdotal evidence suggests the company has lost its lead in the AI ra…

It's worth noting Codex has 2x more stories than Claude https://hn.algolia.com/?query=codex

Re: Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?

#143
post #116

This anecdote is so absurd it sounds like satire. This is the guy with the $23M mansion? > Amodei’s notes describe escalating tense encounters, including one, months later, in which Altman summoned him and his sister, Daniela, who worked in safety and policy at the company, to tell them that he had it on “good authority” from a senior executive that they had been plotting a coup. Daniela, the notes continue, “lost it…

He's a liar and untrustworthy. Based on their public statements, that's a big part of why the board fired him.

Of course, (despite the fact that Altman previously publicly stated that it was very important that the board can fire him) he got himself unfired very quickly.

Re: Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?

#150
post #114

Am I the only one that feels like Claude is clearly winning code generation, and Gemini in general LLM? I just don’t feel like OpenAI has a legitimate shot at winning any of the AI battles. Therefore, I feel like “Sam Altman may control our future” is a far stretch.

Well I just canceled my Claude Pro subscription because of the mysterious limits that I don't experience with codex, even after paying for "extra usage". If Anthropic can't figure out their capacity problems they are in trouble.

I doubt Anthropic see this as their capacity problem. They like "extra usage", and users who don't, well its their capacity problem.
Post reply on HN