Live data from Hacker News

If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

news.ycombinator.com

141–150 of 346 posts

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#141

This headline is false; it will not go take your private repos and dump them into a training dataset. Rather, GitHub will train on your copilot interactions with your private repos. If you do not use copilot, this makes no difference to you, though you should probably still turn it off.

What if one of my contributors uses copilot?

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft would never do this (-:

I don't like when people make sarcastic remarks and sign off in a way that indicates it was sarcasm. It kills it for me. Lol. Like using that /s or using that smiling emoji sign you used. A good joke would land even if some other people miss it because of the text format. "Microsoft would never do this" would have landed for me.

Tone does not translate well through text.

If you can tell sarcasm from text, that doesn't mean everyone can.

For my part, the smiley face was much-appreciated as I've seen people who genuinely would think that with a straight face.

--- EDIT: Spelling of a word

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#144
post #69
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Edit: Okay, sounds like you guys are pissed to the point where it seems like the pro tip here is to stop using GitHub. Pro tip: sign up for the business/enterprise version when reasonable in price. I do this with Google Workspace. You can also do it with GitHub. (Google doesn’t train on Workspace, Github doesn’t train on business customers, etc)

Pro tip: You could instead spend that money to spin up a forgejo instance for as little as $2 a month https://www.pikapods.com/apps#development (not affiliated, just a happy customer) Please don't reward these companies with money.

Or, alternatively, self-host a gitea instance!

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#146

While I understand the network effect of github for public project, I don't really understand why one would want to use it for private repos. There are tons of git providers including free ones that include full gitlab/gitea/forgejo to get similar features to github and there is nothing more easy to self host or host on a vps with near zero maintenance.

Sorry, which ones support 2-GB private repositories and are supported by package managers?

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Google doesn’t train on Workspace, Github doesn’t train on business customers, etc ...yet

Or, they don't train on it, but who's to say they're not harvesting analytics which may or may or not code samples, prompt data, etc. Which are then laundered through some sort of anonymization pipeline, to the point where they can argue that it no longer qualifies as your data, and can be freely trained upon. Conspiratorial thinking? Sure. But if you've been around for a couple decades and seen the games these peopl…

Nothing conspirational about it. Getting data that their users or customers don't actually intend to give is the bread and butter of these companies. And they will do what they can to get it.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#150

No we won’t. Details here https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-gi... For users of Free, Pro and Pro+ Copilot, if you don’t opt out then we will start collecting usage data of Copilot for use in model training. If you are a subscriber for Business or Pro we do not train on usage. The blog post covers more details but we do not train on private repo data at rest, just interaction data with Copilot.…

Thanks for the clarification. The OP here made me think I missed something in both the blog post about the change and in the available settings.
Post reply on HN