Live data from Hacker News

Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

tooscut.app

141–148 of 148 posts

Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

#141

I like the promise, but the hill is very steep and I don't see much on delivery here. Very hopeful, but I would rather see this kind of thing launch significantly further than where it is at. This appears to be a good base, now let's see it again when there is Text support, animations, transitions, filters, etc.

We actually already support text, transitions, and animation of basic properties as well as some filters. I would be interested to hear more about your use case and which capabilities you felt were missing from what you saw.

I am always on the lookout for a tool that can replace Premiere first of all, but that that is easy to do. Replacing After Effects, no one has ever accomplished, even remotely close. I have actually been able to somewhat (big asterisk here) use Remotion in some instances as an AE replacement.

I can use Remotion for example, to design any kind of animation in code, and overlay it on video, which, especially with AI, lets me do quite a lot.

One thing I did for a while, was render some assets, and then with remotion I created a template, and a script, that would pump out videos automatically. Think similar in concept to like, a Daily Mail news video, where its just some music, some footage, and some text overlayed. Every video is the same, they just need to drag and drop some assets in and click Go. Remotion was great for that.

Still, I made the actual assets for the graphics in after effects. In mine, a date would "glitch" onto the screen and then glitch out. Probably possible to do with code, obviously, but was much more complicated than using AE to design that.

Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

#142
Feedback from just 5 minutes of messing around.

- You can't delete the audio track from a video, only mute it

- You can't add a new Audio track

- Because of the two points above you can't really seem to be able to overlay a song to a video that already has an audio track?

- You can only scroll horizontally and not vertically in the track block, so tracks can go out of screen and remain invisible

Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is absolutely not an open source license https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0/ It violates point 1,5 and 6 of the open source definition https://opensource.org/osd

For nitpicking like that let me do some counter-nitpicking: please write 'Open Source (OSI)', 'Open Source (TM)' or at least capitalize it as 'Open Source' so that people know where you're coming from. The commonly used 'open source' just means 'the source is in the open'. Let's not allow organizations to hijack commonly used words.

Open source has a commonly held definition, it's not nitpicking. I will not let corporations cynically hijack the definition to mean "you can look at the source" the way you suggest.

Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want free, Resolve will run circles around whatever open source thing you can find. No need for WGPU, it just runs the GPU. Sadly, things like this just put a bad taste in my mouth about the whole concept of running code in a browser like this. It's buggy as hell. It doesn't run in all browsers. And I really have to ask why we think the browser is the place to run this. We've moved from Java and now to WASM in…

Different use case. "Runs everywhere instantly" beats "installs + config" for a lot of workflows.

How does WGPU work on systems with multiple GPUs? Do you not get to config which one is used? That'd be a waste. What about systems with external monitors or even multiple monitors? How do you config what goes on which screen with out some config? Oh, it doesn't handle that? That's professional. How do you setup a control surface without some config? Oh, it doesn't work with control surfaces? That's not very professional either.

Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

If your baseline is Resolve, sure. But most people aren't cutting Hollywood timelines.

Most people cutting hollywood timelines are not using Resolve either.

Re: Professional video editing, right in the browser with WebGPU and WASM

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want free, Resolve will run circles around whatever open source thing you can find. No need for WGPU, it just runs the GPU. Sadly, things like this just put a bad taste in my mouth about the whole concept of running code in a browser like this. It's buggy as hell. It doesn't run in all browsers. And I really have to ask why we think the browser is the place to run this. We've moved from Java and now to WASM in…

I stopped trusting resolve after they decided to paywall reactor. Putting a paywall on plugins that users contribute for free is just shitty.

There's a standalone version of reactor now
Post reply on HN