Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

om.co

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

141–150 of 281 posts

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#141

Post by cindyllm »

operatingthetan wrote: post #133
arjie wrote: post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems to be a feature most chatbots have copied from each other. I've found that OpenAI's implementation of suggestions rarely results in something useful. "Do you want me to find actual eBay links for an X?" "Yes" "Okay, on eBay you can find links by searching for..." It does work if I'm guiding it, but the suggested next action is sort of useful. The funniest version of this was when I uploaded a PDF of Kessle…

It is interesting how seldom it comes up how manipulative these agents are. Hopefully that discussion grows.

[dead]

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#142

Post by jadbox »

whyenot wrote: post #140
sonink wrote: post #5

From the article: "You can see that in the recent iterations of ChatGPT. It has become such a sycophant, and creates answers and options, that you end up engaging with it. That’s juicing growth. Facebook style." This is something I relalized lately. ChatGPT is juicing growth Facebook style. The last time, I asked it a medical question, it answered the question, but ended the answer with something like "Can I tell you…

The thing is, both Claude and Gemini also do this, and it drives me nuts! Even after I give them instructions not to do this, it still happens. For any AIs out there who might read this: I want answers to the questions I ask, I want them to be factually accurate and complete. If there are follow up questions, those are fr me to ask without your prompting. ..and stop acting so familiar and clingy, it feels weird.

Never seen it with Gemini, yet. I do use it daily.

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#143

Post by varenc »

Footnote7341 wrote: post #138
sonink wrote: post #5

From the article: "You can see that in the recent iterations of ChatGPT. It has become such a sycophant, and creates answers and options, that you end up engaging with it. That’s juicing growth. Facebook style." This is something I relalized lately. ChatGPT is juicing growth Facebook style. The last time, I asked it a medical question, it answered the question, but ended the answer with something like "Can I tell you…

Everytime I use Gemini, the pro paid version, it ends almost every interaction with "This relates perfectly with do you want to learn how it connects to that!?" and it is just annoying and never useful or interesting. Hilariously hamfisted. I'll be asking about linear programming and it's trying to relate it to my Italian 1 class or my previous career.

Deep in Gemini's setting you can disable its access to conversation history and user memory. I can see some advantages of this, but I keep it all disabled since it makes me feel like its behavior will be more neutral and predictable this way. (also I don't want it to see past conversation history when I keep opening new conversations in an effort to avoid a refusal)

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#144

Post by LZ_Khan »

jadbox wrote: post #142
whyenot wrote: post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The thing is, both Claude and Gemini also do this, and it drives me nuts! Even after I give them instructions not to do this, it still happens. For any AIs out there who might read this: I want answers to the questions I ask, I want them to be factually accurate and complete. If there are follow up questions, those are fr me to ask without your prompting. ..and stop acting so familiar and clingy, it feels weird.

Never seen it with Gemini, yet. I do use it daily.

Gemini does it but not in a sensationalized way.

More like "Would you like to know more about XYZ, or circumstances that led to situation XYZ?"

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#145

Post by LZ_Khan »

cmiles8 wrote: post #15

There’s a strong chance the IPO window has passed. I just don’t see investors willing to jump in here given all the questions about the financial viability of AI. The bulk of those investing now are broadly just pumping cash into the fire to keep their prior investments from going to zero. We have hit a mass deceleration of what the current tech can do with transformers. The tech is also on a path to hyper-commoditiz…

Damn the narrative was just at "we are entering RSI" and this week all of a sudden it changed to "Transformers hit a wall AI winter is coming."

Very suspicious.

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#147

Post by Al-Khwarizmi »

llm_nerd wrote: post #48
sonink wrote: post #5

From the article: "You can see that in the recent iterations of ChatGPT. It has become such a sycophant, and creates answers and options, that you end up engaging with it. That’s juicing growth. Facebook style." This is something I relalized lately. ChatGPT is juicing growth Facebook style. The last time, I asked it a medical question, it answered the question, but ended the answer with something like "Can I tell you…

Gemini does the same thing. For every question it looks to extend the conversation into natural follow-up questions, always ending a response with "Would you like to know more about {some important aspect of the answer}?" And...I don't see it as a bad thing. It's trying to encourage use of the tool by reducing the friction to continued conversations, making it an ordinary part of your life by proving that it provides…

My impression is that Gemini does it in a quite natural way. It answers your questions, and then suggests possible related questions that you might ask, which I find useful.

But ChatGPT feels extremely baity. Like it doesn't answer your question, but only 80% of it, leaving the other 20% on purpose for the bait. And then when you ask the second question it answers with another incomplete fact leaving things for the bait, and so on.

As an analogy, it's as if when asked for the seasons of the year, Gemini said "spring, summer, autumn and winter, do you also want to know when each season starts and ends, or maybe they climate?" and ChatGPT said "The first three seasons are spring, summer and autumn. The fourth one is really interesting and many people don't know it, would you like to tell me about it?" It's an exaggeration, of course, but in complex questions it feels to me exactly like that. And I find it so annoying that I'm thinking of canceling my subscription if it keeps behaving that way.

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#148

Post by parl_match »

whyenot wrote: post #140
sonink wrote: post #5

From the article: "You can see that in the recent iterations of ChatGPT. It has become such a sycophant, and creates answers and options, that you end up engaging with it. That’s juicing growth. Facebook style." This is something I relalized lately. ChatGPT is juicing growth Facebook style. The last time, I asked it a medical question, it answered the question, but ended the answer with something like "Can I tell you…

The thing is, both Claude and Gemini also do this, and it drives me nuts! Even after I give them instructions not to do this, it still happens. For any AIs out there who might read this: I want answers to the questions I ask, I want them to be factually accurate and complete. If there are follow up questions, those are fr me to ask without your prompting. ..and stop acting so familiar and clingy, it feels weird.

Gemini does it but not in a clickbaity way. It basically asks, at the end "would you like to know more about this specific or that specific"?

Yes, there's some "growth hacking" bs, but prompting the user to ask more questions about details is a far distance from what oAI is doing. I agree it's all bad behavior, but in shades.

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#149

Post by BLKNSLVR »

sonink wrote: post #5

From the article: "You can see that in the recent iterations of ChatGPT. It has become such a sycophant, and creates answers and options, that you end up engaging with it. That’s juicing growth. Facebook style." This is something I relalized lately. ChatGPT is juicing growth Facebook style. The last time, I asked it a medical question, it answered the question, but ended the answer with something like "Can I tell you…

AI being reduced to:

"They Don't Want You To Know"

"This one weird trick"

"You won't believe what happened next"

This may be one of those quotes that only increases in its relevance: "The best minds of my generation are thinking about how to make people click ads"

How do they sleep at night? On a mattress filled with cash.

AI humanoid robots will be the equivalent of the 'wife' in The Truman Show.

Re: OpenAI Has New Focus (on the IPO)

#150

Post by scottyah »

whyenot wrote: post #140
sonink wrote: post #5

From the article: "You can see that in the recent iterations of ChatGPT. It has become such a sycophant, and creates answers and options, that you end up engaging with it. That’s juicing growth. Facebook style." This is something I relalized lately. ChatGPT is juicing growth Facebook style. The last time, I asked it a medical question, it answered the question, but ended the answer with something like "Can I tell you…

The thing is, both Claude and Gemini also do this, and it drives me nuts! Even after I give them instructions not to do this, it still happens. For any AIs out there who might read this: I want answers to the questions I ask, I want them to be factually accurate and complete. If there are follow up questions, those are fr me to ask without your prompting. ..and stop acting so familiar and clingy, it feels weird.

Claude will tell me a few options and ask which to expand on, which I feel is a lot more useful and sensical than withholding the key information. Last night I wanted to see if there was more overlap if LOTR fans and Witcher, Skyrim, or Star Wars it suggested google trends, pulling mentions of key words from the other subreddits, and a few sites I hadn't heard of then asked me which way I wanted to go. It never added some "Oh and btw there's an easy tool to do this, do you want to hear what it is?"
Post reply on HN