Live data from Hacker News

The “small web” is bigger than you might think

kevinboone.me

141–150 of 263 posts

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#141
Just because this is relevant to the small web and started off as just that ... so I am going to do a very shameful post as I am the creator:

https://www.demarkus.io/ https://github.com/latebit-io/demarkus

Mark protocol, with client tools, tui, server, and mcp (yes I know, hype train, but useful for agents) only markdown format. Simple :)

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#142
post #72

I read alot against monetization in the comments. I think because we are used monetization being so exploitative, filled with dark patterns and bad incentives on the Big Web. But it doesnt need to be thia way: small web can also be about sustainable monetization. In fact there's a whole page on that on https://indieweb.org/business-models There's nothing wrong with "publishers" aspiring to get paid.

I also think equating good = "no monetization" is exactly how we've ended up in a situation where everything is controlled by a few giant mega corps, hordes of MBAs, and unethical ad networks.

We should want indie developers, writers, etc to make money so that the only game in town doesn't end up being those who didn't care about being ethical.

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#143
I built https://prose.sh as part of my journey into Gemini and back out. Ya, it's just a simple blog, but you can completely manage it with ssh and is compatible with hugo when people want to eject.

We also recently released support for plain-text-lists which is a gemini-inspired spec that use lists as its foundational structure.

https://pico.sh/plain-text-lists

example: https://blog.pico.sh/ann-034-plain-text-lists

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#144
post #7

A little shell function I have in my ~/.zshrc: pages() { for _ in {1..5}; do curl -sSw '%header{location}\n' https://indieblog.page/random | sed 's/.utm.*//'; done } Here is an example output: $ pages https://alanpearce.eu/post/scriptura/ https://jmablog.com/post/numberones/ https://www.closingtags.com/blog/home-networking https://www.unsungnovelty.org/gallery/layers/ https://thoughts.uncountable.uk/now/ On macOS, we…

Anyone curious this is the same for Linux, except use xdg-open like this:

  $ xdg-open $(pages)

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#145
post #94

It's sad how the snall web became invisible. I used to use all sorts of small websites in 2005. But by 2015 I used only about 10 large ones. Like many changes, I cannot pinpoint exactly when this happened. It just occurred to me someday that I do not run into many unusual websites any longer. It's unfortunate that so much of our behavior is dictated by Google. I dint think it's malicious or even intentional--but at s…

The experience of the internet would be so much more interesting if the search engines unearthed rare blogs or writing from small creators and bloggers that thought things through or shared original ideas.

It did seem we had that for a while and now everything funnels back to a handful of big platforms.

Maybe as AI swallows the data of the entire web, it would start to look for these small sites, small creators, and rare personal content to keep itself interesting and we'll see more of them?

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#148
post #81

Isn't this a simple compute opportunity? ... > March 15 there were 1,251 updates [from feed of small websites ...] too active, to publish all the updates on a single page, even for just one day. Well, I could publish them, but nobody has time to read them all. if the reader accumulates a small set of whitelist keywords, perhaps selected via optionally generating a tag cloud ui, then that est. 1,251 likely drops to ~…

The tag cloud part may be a challenge. Web feeds don't always tag their content.

I have a blog filter that does something similar (https://alexsci.com/rss-blogroll-network/discover/), but the UI I ended up with isn't great and too many things are uncategorized.

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#149

Has there been any effort in taking any of these small web type approaches into a headscale type space? My preferences would be to have a private area where whitelisting prevents crawling or scraping. Am baffled why someone hasn’t created a headscale server and started distributing nodes to personally known ‘good intentioned’ humans. Anyone ever heard of anything like this?

Reminds me of https://notes.pault.ag/tpl/

Re: The “small web” is bigger than you might think

#150
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I dint think it's malicious or even intentional--but at some point they stopped directing traffic to small websites. Small websites have small dollars?

Does Google get money for directing traffic to sites (barring sites that pay for ad placement, that is)? If I search for 'astronomy', Google doesnt earn any money whether i go to the Wikipedia page for astronomy, or Joe's astronomy site, right?

Google gets money for showing ads and sponsored content on the search page. If you click on a site with Google ads or Google scripts, it gets more money and monetarizable PII. So its in their interest to prioritize sites with Google ads or Google services, but only Google staffers know exactly how the search algorithm works.

A few years ago they upranked all results on a few trusted domains, so many of those domains filled up with advertising and cheap copywritten content. They framed this as 'fighting misinformation.'

Post reply on HN