Some reporting on the contents of the speech from last year: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/peter-thiel-... It's suitably insane rambling nonsense. It actually seems to dovetail pretty well with Andreesen's manifesto in that evil is portrayed as anyone who opposed relentless technological progress at any cost. If you worry about the economic or human effects of tech oligarchs (Grete Thunberg is named…
Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
141–150 of 160 posts
Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference to robber Baron this time is that those companies have gone global , so a new Teddy Roosevelt being elected in USA wouldn't help, because these multinationals can just extend outside jurisdiction. Which is very similar to the actual dynamic of states/federal that Teddy tackled [1] Unfortunately the political rhetoric have smeared "the globalists" and equated people that want global coordination to limi…
The penchant for Christ clown insanity is distinctly American though. Secularism never truly touched the hearts of Americans.
The dixiecrats mascarading as Christian Republicans who HN treats as all American Christians don't even believe in the larger USA/Constitution/Human rights so yeah they ignore/are anti a lot of basic American beliefs. They are from a long line of loser traitors to our beliefs.
Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Genuine questions: what can be done in a democratic setting to stop him? Who should take into their hands the job to stop him, and to what lengths should they push themselves?
We are not in a democratic setting in America any more, the people in power are willing to start wars to protect pedophiles, they are willing to hire Nazi thugs to shoot your wives in the face. They are willing to bribe supreme court justices and dismantle democracy, and they will if not stopped by force. Thiel has been obviously and evil sack of shit for decades but more than half of HN viewers revere him. I fear we…
If voting didn't work, they wouldn't poor money into it. If voting didn't work, they wouldn't be trying to force their horrible new ID poll tax laws.
Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correct. We call that “credibility”. People can earn credibility in this world through their accomplishments. If your life accomplishment is sitting in your own piss you lack credibility.
All arguments should be considered on merit of the argument not on credibility of the person.
Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are not in a democratic setting in America any more, the people in power are willing to start wars to protect pedophiles, they are willing to hire Nazi thugs to shoot your wives in the face. They are willing to bribe supreme court justices and dismantle democracy, and they will if not stopped by force. Thiel has been obviously and evil sack of shit for decades but more than half of HN viewers revere him. I fear we…
We defeated the incredibly rich southern slave owners. We can defeat these shitty traitors. If voting didn't work, they wouldn't poor money into it. If voting didn't work, they wouldn't be trying to force their horrible new ID poll tax laws.
Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#146Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#147Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#148Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#149Re: Peter Thiel's Antichrist Lectures
#150Behind the Bastards did a good two-parter on Thiel's lectures. He sounds dangerously insane. It'd be bad enough if he was just some random crank, but the fact he's got the level of power and influence needed to actually make his beliefs happen makes it exponentially worse. Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtR7ny9TuCY Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXhyx-vVG_Y
Genuine questions: what can be done in a democratic setting to stop him? Who should take into their hands the job to stop him, and to what lengths should they push themselves?
What are you prepared to do to contain/restrain a person who is non compos mentis?