Live data from Hacker News

Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

ycombinator.com

141–149 of 149 posts

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#141
post #95
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I was a kid, we had a neighbor who had somehow wrapped some wire around the power lines enough times to siphon off an interesting amount of power. I never saw the wire myself, so it might not have actually happened. But people certainly talked about doing it way back when.

We had a neighbor that put loops of wire under a 600kV line and got enough power to run a water pump for cows. The square law makes that kind of thing pretty low-return.

The Mythbusters also tried it in the "Free Energy" episode. They pretty much said extracting any useful amount of energy is not worth the effort.

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#142

> Removing battery swaps is the last step to deploy UAVs autonomously at scale. I can't say, as a citizen, that I'm particularly excited about this. > Autonomous drones can deliver over 20x the inspection coverage for the same cost. And we have 20x the manpower to review this footage? I wonder if you're just generating a bunch of data that cannot be practically used. "More coverage" isn't always the best answer. "Bet…

We have done automated utility inspections for the past few years. Computer vision is not a problem any more. When we were starting we had to annotate thousands of images. Today some use cases require less than a 100. More interesting problems are pre-field planning, sagging, or BLOS compliance

We annotate via qwen, and feed that back into training our vision ML. High accuracy.

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#144
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those fiber optic lines only work 50-60% of the time. Often the drones are carried 20km on foot into position which sucks as you know half the equipment on your back won't work.

Where did you see that?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJDkG9bBvms

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#146
post #114
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We had a neighbor that put loops of wire under a 600kV line and got enough power to run a water pump for cows. The square law makes that kind of thing pretty low-return.

Here's some calculations on the return [0] (usual caveats of stuff found on the internet). Quite low returns indeed! [0] https://user.physics.unc.edu/~deardorf/phys25/rwp/exam1rwpso...

Yah, he was just running a 12V bilge pump on a battery, and used a charge controller to keep the battery up so just needed a voltage slightly above the battery voltage. I doubt it used a kWh per day as it cycled. He might still be using it, haven't talked to him in a few years.

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, there's a difference between breaking and being broken. I wouldn't say 33% of all B-17s "didn't work" because they were shot down.

Also, those drones are essentially guided projectiles, and not even particularly expensive ones at that. What percentage of projectiles do you imagine successfully connect with their targets in combat?

That's exactly what I mean though. If you miss the target with your rifle, would you call that "bullet not working"?

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not lasers through the air?

Line of sight only, alignment is very hard, and if youre near the where its pointing you light up like a christmas tree

> you light up like a christmas tree

Perfect for Christmastime

Re: Drones that recharge directly on transmission lines

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, those drones are essentially guided projectiles, and not even particularly expensive ones at that. What percentage of projectiles do you imagine successfully connect with their targets in combat?

That's exactly what I mean though. If you miss the target with your rifle, would you call that "bullet not working"?

Yeah I completely agree with everything you said.
Post reply on HN