Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is designed to save people.
There is no such thing as a defensive weapon. You might be tempted to say "what about a missile shield?" but such a thing allows the owner to act with impunity with levels of violence we arguably haven't seen since 1945. As a real example of this, the only reason a deeper conflict didn't develop with Iran this year was because Iran demonstrated they could overwhelm the various layers of Israel's missile shield and Ir…
Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
141–150 of 629 posts
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#142A lot of comments decrying new weapons tech, but I think drone defense tech is particularly critical right now and going to save a lot of lives. Put another way, I don't think we would be against new clothing that made bullets less effective, even if it remains terrible that such clothing is needed. Especially as AI becomes better and cheaper and suicide drones become more nimble and autonomous. If you have seen any…
What Ukraine have found a net launcher is effective and cheap solution against drones and may allow more use of tanks and heavy armor vehicles again in 2026. Then shotguns with a special ammunition is effective. Then against fiber drones a fence with moving wire works surprisingly good to cut the fiber.
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#143Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#144Israel saw over 16,000 rocket attacks last year from fundamentalist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and Yemen. The Iron Dome intercepted ~90% of them, resulting in thousands of lives saved. Iron Beam is the newer incarnation of this technology that uses lasers to intercept incoming rockets and drones with precision and much lower cost. Wonderful technology.
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the war in June, Iran fired 500kg warhead ballistic missiles. These were the only lethal munition they used, killing a couple dozen civilians. The Iron Beam is not relevant against ballistic missiles.
> Iran fired 500kg warhead ballistic missiles Iran also fired “over 1,000 suicide drones” [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_war
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#146Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#147[flagged]
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
There are recordings of Israeli drones engaging in psychological warfare against the civilian population by playing those horrible sounds https://x.com/AJIunit/status/1863553707897680291
Re: Iron Beam: Israel's first operational anti drone laser system
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh, to what degree is this technology gatekept by battery advances? A few decades ago lasers were dismissed because they involved chemical reagents for high power and explosive capacitors for even low-power applications.
> Huh, to what degree is this technology gatekept by battery advances? Not too much. The power delivery was doable even 15 years ago. It would have just been more expensive and heavier. The bigger issue I believe would have been the lens and tracking capabilities. For the tracking to work you need some pretty good cameras, pretty fast computers, and pretty good object recognition. We are talking about using high spee…