Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mondragon is often used by people who don't know much about the subject as a counter example, but if you look under the hood, you'll see it doesn't even compare: Less than half the workers own shares and the majority of shares is held by a small circle of executives in the richest branches. That's basically a standard capitalist pig with some socialist lipstick to give pseudo-Marxists an argument in these discussions…
> anything that truly benefits workers will be at odds with things that benefit the business. Generally yes, unless the workers own the business.
In which case the business will have a harder time competing. Not sure why we needed to circle back to that. This is not rocket science. If you believe you can somehow bypass the way the world works and create a socialist utopia using such a trivial approach, you should check if your opinions are based on facts or on dogmatic beliefs. Because the facts are quite clear once you really get into the material.