Live data from Hacker News

California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

dmv.ca.gov

141–150 of 167 posts

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#141
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

BTW, this is the way: Assuming nothing exceptional, with the every-half-hour or better frequency, I use Waymo to get to a Caltrain station, take Caltrain to a nearby stop, and then Waymo from there to destination.

It would be dope if the Waymo app, given that it knows the travel times via Google maps transit and your location, could arrange this for you so you walk right into a waiting Waymo the moment your train arrives, and the whole thing could be routed as one trip in the app.

I love this idea and it’s an environmental win as well.

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#142
post #95
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla is not competition to Waymo. There are 10 other companies that are currently testing without a driver. Those are competition. Tesla so far is a gimmick of self-driving with a safety driver that takes over once in a while. That's where Waymo was more than 5 years ago.

The recent version of FSD in my Tesla is pretty amazing. Press "Start FSD" when in my driveway, and 20 minutes later it arrives at my destination and parks, without any input from me the entire time. I was skeptical too about FSD for a while but I'm starting to believe. These days I pretty much only disengage it when I'm impatient that it's being too polite. Unsupervised isn't far off!

the issue is that your Tesla cannot be "too far off" as you seem to indicate. it needs to be right absolutely every single time.

One successful ride is easy. 10 successful rides is still easy.

100k successful rides without a serious incident? Way more difficult.

And that's why those anecdotal reports over a couple ride mean absolutely nothing

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#143
post #20

The effectiveness with which AVs have been able to test and spread despite local municipalities being fairly luddite about them does provide positive evidence for the idea that states are the right level of government for many of these decisions. If this had been entirely up to Bay Area municipalities it would have been infeasible, and this outcome and the lives consequently saved will be due to state-level decision-…

Aren't said fragmented municipalities mostly using CEQA, a state law, to oppose development?

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#144
post #20

The effectiveness with which AVs have been able to test and spread despite local municipalities being fairly luddite about them does provide positive evidence for the idea that states are the right level of government for many of these decisions. If this had been entirely up to Bay Area municipalities it would have been infeasible, and this outcome and the lives consequently saved will be due to state-level decision-…

Waymo is testing in Tokyo, so we'll see.

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#145
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're playing it via Spotify, it's not your music, it's Spotify's. Waymo is cool technology but I am disappointed at how the app requires a Google account plus access to google play services on an Android phone, and how the streaming music feature requires some kind of protocol that only Spotify and some proprietary Google music app support. All of my music is stored on a personal server that I stream to my phone…

It's not your music unless you own the copyright, even if its on a disc or drive.

[dead]

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#146

Whoah, Waymo would be able to take one from Mountain View to Napa. (I get why Cupertino is excluded. But. Oof. Come on.)

why?`

Apple is based in Cupertino. And Apple once had self-driving car ambitions.

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It appears not to be. Here are the ones in Santa Clara County: - Milpitas - Mountain View - Palo Alto Santa - San Jose - Sunnyvale - Unincorporated Area (Lexington Hills area, overlapping Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties) I don't know why it says "Palo Alto Santa" Edit: I guess it's "Palo Alto Santa" to disambiguate between Palo Alto, which is in Santa Clara County, and East Palo Alto, which is in San Mateo County…

Looking at the city limits, I don't understand why East Palo Alto isn't called North Palo Alto instead.

[deleted]

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It appears not to be. Here are the ones in Santa Clara County: - Milpitas - Mountain View - Palo Alto Santa - San Jose - Sunnyvale - Unincorporated Area (Lexington Hills area, overlapping Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties) I don't know why it says "Palo Alto Santa" Edit: I guess it's "Palo Alto Santa" to disambiguate between Palo Alto, which is in Santa Clara County, and East Palo Alto, which is in San Mateo County…

Looking at the city limits, I don't understand why East Palo Alto isn't called North Palo Alto instead.

[deleted]

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#149
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I frequently have to wait 20-30 minutes for an Uber or Lyft pickup at my apartment in south Brooklyn. I'm sure it doesn't help that I'm usually going somewhere like Bay Ridge if I'm ordering an Uber and not somewhere popular. If it's after 1am I just open both Lyft and Uber and book both because at least one of them will just park the car and not come and wait out the timer before it assigns a new driver. I wish the…

Book Uber Black and 99% of those issues go away. Have taken more Ubers than I'd like to admit, so I'm comfortable calling this a large enough sample size to qualify as anecdata.

Remember back when Uber was basically 100% Uber Black? That was nice.

Re: California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It appears not to be. Here are the ones in Santa Clara County: - Milpitas - Mountain View - Palo Alto Santa - San Jose - Sunnyvale - Unincorporated Area (Lexington Hills area, overlapping Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties) I don't know why it says "Palo Alto Santa" Edit: I guess it's "Palo Alto Santa" to disambiguate between Palo Alto, which is in Santa Clara County, and East Palo Alto, which is in San Mateo County…

Looking at the city limits, I don't understand why East Palo Alto isn't called North Palo Alto instead.

I always assumed it was because San Francisco is "North", and East Palo Alto is on the "East" side of highway 101.
Post reply on HN