Live data from Hacker News

M5 MacBook Pro

apple.com

141–150 of 579 posts

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

%100 ram growth in 5 years still very slow and cheap.

I think 8GB was also what we had in ... 2012? Or am I wrong. Memory has been going so slow.

You could (unsupported) run 16gb ram on 2010 rMBP models, back before it was soldered on. Worked great, not to mention swapping the spinning drive for an SSD.

At this point, I get the soldered on ram, for better or worse... I do wish at least storage was more approachable.

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#142
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They release the Pro and Max parts after the base part. This has been their release strategy for past generations.

Does anyone have a guess on when they could be releasing a potential M4 Ultra Mac Studio?

I think they said M4 Ultra Studio is not going to happen, have to wait for M5 Ultra...

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#143
I've been a Windows fan forever, but the new Mac hardware is making it hard to remain and it's about time for a new laptop... can't get a good Windows installed on these chips like you could on the Intel-based ones, only virtualized.

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#144
post #12

Lowest tier comes with 16 gb of memory, same memory size with lowest M. air, why Apple?

The Pro sales page says their RAM is unified, which is more efficient than traditional. Anyone have a concept by how much more efficient unified RAM performs vs RAM? Their sales copy for reference: "M-series chips include unified memory, which is more efficient than traditional RAM. This single pool of high-performance memory allows apps to efficiently share data between the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine.... This means…

The fact that it's unified just means it's shared between CPU/GPU usage which can be a good thing. A lot of the performance comes from more channels and a more stable distance from the CPU itself... Getting really fast performance from RAM is more difficult with a detachable interface in the middle, and longer traces.

Still not the fastest ram, that they use for dedicated GPUs, but faster than most x86 options.

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been on a mac for ~4 years now. It was a bit of a struggle to get used to it, coming from windows. The only thing I really miss now is alt-tab working as expected. (It's a massive pain to move between two windows of the same program)

You know you can use CMD+backtick (CMD+`) to cycle between windows of the same app? Add shift to go in reverse. Or otherwise you can enable the app exposé feature to swipe down with three fingers and it will show you only windows of the same app.

I’m a lifelong Mac user and didn’t know this.

Shame on me.

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#146
post #60

Apparently, in Europe, the box will not contain a charger [1]. This is absolutely mind-blowing to me. edit: suggested retail price also dropped with EUR 100. Mind is less blown now. It seems like a good thing in fact. edit2: in Belgium, the combined price of the 70W adapter and 2m USB-C to MagSafe is EUR 120. [1] https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/new-macbook-pro-does-no...

The real crime is that it starts at 1799 euros, which is $2100, vs $1599 in the US, I know US prices are before tax but even with 20% VAT you're far off...

what happened to US tariffs? how can they be cheaper in the US than EU?

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#147

Apparently, in Europe, the box will not contain a charger [1]. This is absolutely mind-blowing to me. edit: suggested retail price also dropped with EUR 100. Mind is less blown now. It seems like a good thing in fact. edit2: in Belgium, the combined price of the 70W adapter and 2m USB-C to MagSafe is EUR 120. [1] https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/new-macbook-pro-does-no...

> Apparently, in Europe, the box will not contain a charger [1]. This is absolutely mind-blowing to me.

Same, for a laptop??? Really? Wild. You can charge these with USB-C chargers too.

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I appreciate this comment! I'm often envious of these Macbook announcements, as the battery life on my XPS is poor (~2ish hours) when running Ubuntu. (No idea if it's also bad on Windows - as I haven't run it in years). Thanks for the heads-up.

Not that useful as a heads up. MacOS is great for development. Tons of high profile devs, from Python and ML, to JS, Java, Go, Rust and more use it - the very people who headline major projects for those languages. 2ish hours battery life is crazy. It's 8+ hours with the average Macbook.

> It's 8+ hours with the average Macbook.

Did I get a dud? I rarely get over 2.5

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's much cheaper in the US

I have a strong feeling Apple is raising prices elsewhere in order to avoid pissing off the notoriously sensitive consumers in America. Sony is doing similar things with making the PlayStation expensive everywhere to make it affordable for Americans. The world is essentially subsidizing the tariffs for Americans. People in other countries will get pissed but ultimately suck it up and buy a product. People in America…

> I have a strong feeling Apple is raising prices elsewhere in order to avoid pissing off the notoriously sensitive consumers in America.

Or a certain individual…

Re: M5 MacBook Pro

#150
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I thought I would use it for playing with LLMs, but local dev on a Mac is not fun and I still don't have it fully set up. Sounds more like a you problem, probably due to unfamiliarity. There are endless options for local dev on a Mac, and a huge share of devs using one.

I've been on a mac for ~4 years now. It was a bit of a struggle to get used to it, coming from windows. The only thing I really miss now is alt-tab working as expected. (It's a massive pain to move between two windows of the same program)

Apparently i'm the only one who didn't know about cmd+`
Post reply on HN