Live data from Hacker News

Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

github.com

141–150 of 307 posts

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#142
post #3

Testimonials on the main website are somewhat unusual - https://nuclearplayer.com/

Presumably they're being scrapped by automation with no hand curation. That's very brave, I'll give them that!

IDK, I think they're just having a laugh.

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#143
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musicians are not the consumers, users are the consumers. Some musicians will always be unhappy, this is unavoidable due to complex issues around IP rights, compensation for art, and the length of time it takes to make changes to these systems (not to mention simply how much existing content is out there new and current artists are competing against, attention economy and all that). n=1, I am optimizing for access to…

Musicians are not the consumers, but it's their work being consumed and this software would have no purpose without them. And to be clear, my problem isn't that this software upset some musicians. It's that the developers highlighting that fact as part of their marketing suggests they take pride in angering musicians. That is a level of disrespect that goes way beyond the sort of passive consumer level disrespect of…

I think it’s just funny to post bad reviews.

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is a detail which is the responsibility of the artist as a businessperson. If you give away pizza with a big stack of ad flyers, no one would complain when that business doesn't make that much money because no one reads the ad flyers all they do is eat the pizza and toss the ads. We live in a world where said pizza shops want to force you to look at each flyer in the ad stack, but for years they didn't sit you d…

>Eat and weep for a world where we can't just exchange money for food. Youtube sells subscriptions for YouTube Music if you want to be able to listen to the music in the background or without ads. Violating YouTube's terms of service is unethical.

Can you explain why TOS violations in general are unethical?

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#146

> When pressed for reasons what exactly is so bad about Electron, they can rarely offer anything than vaguely mumbled "memory usage" or "b-but it's an entire browser" (both of which have not been true for years, for example Electron's memory usage has improved dramatically, but the meme stuck) I downloaded Nuclear (the AppImage, if that matters) and booted it up. Instant 300MB RAM usage. I think I'll pass.

I installed using Software on Ubuntu and its only 153MB which is not even the size of the biggest Chrome tab I have open. If it was written in Rust it would be maybe 15MB but I have 16GB in this 6yo laptop so it is no biggy.

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#148
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

300 MB is 1.25% of my RAM. An application using 1.25% of my RAM seems reasonable.

How about 10 electron applications all with different purposes using 12.5% of your RAM?

Sounds totally reasonable to me. I'm running ten windowed applications and they're still leaving 87.5% of my RAM available for other things? No problem there.

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is a detail which is the responsibility of the artist as a businessperson. If you give away pizza with a big stack of ad flyers, no one would complain when that business doesn't make that much money because no one reads the ad flyers all they do is eat the pizza and toss the ads. We live in a world where said pizza shops want to force you to look at each flyer in the ad stack, but for years they didn't sit you d…

>Eat and weep for a world where we can't just exchange money for food. Youtube sells subscriptions for YouTube Music if you want to be able to listen to the music in the background or without ads. Violating YouTube's terms of service is unethical.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/article/2024/aug/15/disney-...

Might have a word with you

Re: Nuclear: Desktop music player focused on streaming from free sources

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Eat and weep for a world where we can't just exchange money for food. Youtube sells subscriptions for YouTube Music if you want to be able to listen to the music in the background or without ads. Violating YouTube's terms of service is unethical.

Can you explain why TOS violations in general are unethical?

If you enter into an agreement with someone you should follow the agreement to the best of your ability. Purposefully agreeing to agreements when you know you will violate them is exploitative behavior as you are taking advantage of someone because you are purposefully not holding up your end of the deal when you know that they will continue to hold up their end.
Post reply on HN