Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

news.ycombinator.com

141–150 of 163 posts

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently no one remembers when Firefox changed their terms of service literally this year to become adversarial toward their own users. Librewolf is the way to go now.

The binaries aren't signed… :’( Also, it seems quite vague to me exactly who/what company/entity is behind it.

What does the binaries not being signed mean?

It seems waterfox (?) has a legal entity behind it for your exact reason!

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No thanks. Their own devs have gladly called the project "very woke", and a "certainly quite political project".

so? is the browser any good?

It’s just secured Firefox. I use it and like it

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#144
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Errrr.... https://winaero.com/mozilla-has-removed-the-do-not-sell-user...

Did you look at the FAQ page they created afterwards? 'do not sell user data' is too broad legally. It's a challenge in some jurisdictions. So they removed that. But it's not because they sell the data. They do have partnerships (like they did Pocket for example). In this case, they have anonymous stats that they share with others and that, in some jurisdictions, could fall under 'selling user data'

If I’m not mistaken they own an advertisement company which they use the data for.

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#145
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No thanks. Their own devs have gladly called the project "very woke", and a "certainly quite political project".

These days the term "woke" has lost almost all meaning. It used to mean being "awake" i.e. aware of socio-economic factors in society. Today, as far as I can tell, it simply refers to whatever the big corporations/alt-right doesn't like. Just like how they refer to anything left of oligarchy as "communism". To me them calling themselves "very woke" reads as "we are against anti-human behavior", which is a good thing.

> Just like how they refer to anything left of oligarchy as "communism"

To the left of oligarchy? I thought it was anything to the left of getting hit repeatedly in the head with a hammer that they labelled as communism? There must have been a massive leftward shift in society since I last checked the news!

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#147
post #28

HN was so hyped when chrome came out. Pushing it hard. A few people were saying, um guys, chrome is made by a company that sells ads, this is not going to work out well.

I remember Firefox crashing on me nearly daily around the time Chrome came out. I didn’t need anyone to push Chrome on me. Chrome was just simply technologically superior.

But of course today there is little reason to not use Firefox.

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#148
FWIW, these instructions allow you to re-enable uBlock in Chrome 138. A temporary fix, but I needed a temporary fix so I could export my hundreds of custom filters (so I can load them into uBlock in Firefox).

https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1itw1bz/end_o...

Re: Tell HN: uBlock Origin on Chrome is finally gone

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No thanks. Their own devs have gladly called the project "very woke", and a "certainly quite political project".

I never had firefox pop up and tell me to attend a drag show or that I need to surf more diverse websites than my usual sports and news sites. how is it woke? I don't care what mozilla the org does. They jsut took a big revenue hit because of the decision against google, they won't have much money for any political endeavors other than maybe privacy and free speech on the web very soon

The woke reference is to LibreWolf, not Mozilla. The dev labelled themselves "very woke" and declared the project will not be apolitical. They banned someone from their chatroom for their identity/political affiliation outside the chat, and so on.

Regardless of one's political applications, I do agree who you are elsewhere shouldn't matter unless you actually start spewing that in an inappropriate context.

Post reply on HN