Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes solidarity between workers possible is the homogeneity of their labour. This condition is not present for tech workers. Labour market conditions are completely different from those of say, a meat processing plant or a factory assembly line.
There is more than enough homogeneity of labor in this industry. All workers should organize.
The Brief Origins of May Day
141–150 of 260 posts
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is the exactly the right kind of question to be asking, but I think your conclusion is wrong. Why think the painters and the welder in an auto factory have more in common than 20 different kinds of programmers do?
I think this is the right line of thinking. My understanding of the grandparent's argument is 2 pieces: 1. Heterogeneity/homogeneity of labour. 2. Tight/lose labour market. I think Argument 1 is the weaker argument. There's a lot of fungibility between software roles. However, there's a higher learning cost. Moving to a new software company requires a few months before someone is close to full productivity. This in c…
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Why is it a zero-sum game to you? Why not advocate for all workers in the name of solidarity? There's no enemy but the class enemy.
this is a bizarre simplification, sounding like some kind of silly propaganda
I am well aware of enemies not fitting into such labeling at all (and probably there are more less obvious ones)
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes there is. I hate unions and I hate union work and I love doing my job.
[flagged]
I don't know or care which class I am betraying.
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
My class is the middle class and for generations we have profited from the extremely productive corporations here in Germany. Never in my life have I felt being "exploited" if anything these corporations have been excessively kind. I don't know or care which class I am betraying.
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no snark here. The union wants my job outsourced so that factory workers can keep theirs. Please tell me why I should have solidarity with them.
You keep repeating this in various comments throughout this submission- can you share links to the materials of the union(s) you are referring to and point out the relevant sections where they are advocating for this? I am curious to take a read for myself, as I'm sure many other readers are
I recently had to deal with them (as part of the Betriebsrat) and, just as human beings, they seemed to be some of the worst people I ever met.
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#147Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tech workers tend to get paid very well. That limits incentivization for unionization. Also there is a stigma that unions tend to be for the middle of the road workers with modest salaries. All the senior leaders with big salaries are not union, and everyone wants the big salary.
It’s silly. MLB players are unionized and they make more money than tech workers. The reason why management don’t need a union is because they have much more say in determining their own wages.
Re: The Brief Origins of May Day
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it a zero-sum game to you? Why not advocate for all workers in the name of solidarity? There's no enemy but the class enemy.
> There's no enemy but the class enemy. this is a bizarre simplification, sounding like some kind of silly propaganda I am well aware of enemies not fitting into such labeling at all (and probably there are more less obvious ones)