Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, maybe he meant to point out that south korea as a country focuses way too much on this work culture and he might've sacrificed his precious family time / just became a "well off cog" in this huge machine. Maybe he was passionate. Maybe he felt obliged / motivated even to prove to others who helped him get to CEO that he was the right choice. But in the end , like all people , he died. In the end , all he had…
Not SK in particular but the point of all of this in general, especially for those who have reached such heights. 63 is a young age to die in a rich country, especially for a corporate titan. Warren Buffett has been at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway an entire-my-lifetime of years between him and Jong-hee Han. Gabe Newell famously has yachts around the world, explores the oceans and seems to be enjoying the fruits of…
I've also worked with people with an entirely different viewpoint and I highly respected them and don't think they lived any less of a life, in fact they are greatly missed and leave behind a legacy.
The architype of those people, "I'm not slowing down, while I can still do my work I'll go on until they take me out of here feet first. That's why you guys are around me, I expect you to call me out when you see me slipping." And they really did get carried out feet first. Their memorials were attend by thousands willingly and they are still respected and an inspiration to those that worked with them.
Neither is wrong. Life isn't binary either. If someone is happy who are we to judge their life.