Live data from Hacker News

A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

twitter.com

141–150 of 404 posts

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#141

Works created by U.S. federal government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain, according to 17 U.S.C. § 105, except for classified or restricted information (but none of what he posted is classified or restricted)

Can one request all of the code this dude has written or is it as his discretion what is released to the public domain?

idk try to make a FOIA request

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Succeed at what? For example, they canceled invasive species control programs for the Great Lakes. Is it a success that they saved a modest amount of money, while letting the condition of the lakes further erode?

Whatever they promised and people voted for by believing in those promises. People wanted a strong man, and they basically got it. I understand markets can be irrational blah blah, but still surprised how people with money aren’t shipping it away or storing it somewhere more safe looking at the current situation.

They are getting their cash reserves ready for the fire sale. That Buffett guy is a good example.

They know thy have the opportunity to buy up the assets and to cash in on the chaos.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#143

A bit tangent, and since I’m an outsider who doesn’t live in the states and have no skin in the game — my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable. I can’t even imagine how you can backtrack this, and fix stuff up. They obviously prepared for it months in advance. Targeting ex-employees of successful product companies and putting them in…

> my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable

They have shown over and over that they are after a good story, not good results. They’re going for shock factor and they’re pumping out propaganda at an alarming rate.

We’ve seen so many hyperbolic claims of rampant fraud with zero evidence. At the same time, they’ve had to remove the biggest wins from their public DOGE leaderboard because they were found to be incorrect (some might say fraudulent claims).

One of their biggest wins was discovered to be an error because someone put it into the DOGE leaderboard as billions instead of millions. On off-by-1000 error in one of their top claims to success is no small matter. Numerous other claims have been shown to account for entire contract amounts, even though they only cancelled the remaining balance of the contract.

They don’t care about facts. They care about what they can convince enough people to believe without getting caught.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#144

I wish people paid this close attention to federal workers and their agencies all the time.

Most federal workers aren’t openly and flagrantly breaking the law. Given each DOGE bro has violated several laws in the past weeks, it’s prudent to focus attention on them. Not too much. But enough that there is a public record for litigation and prosecution at the state and local level in the future.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#145
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Genuinely curious here. How does this relate to Putin being captured by Russia/Putin? This, to me, looks like textbook ineptitude not foreign interference. I want to be clear. I'm not casting doubt on observations that Trump does currently echo Russian talking points. I'm also not trying to argue that he's not captured by Russian interests. I'm merely wondering how this specific piece of information points to that co…

[flagged]

It’s funny how you’re in every thread in this topic, defending the indefensible. So Trump saying that “Ukraine should never have started it” [0] is not echoing a Russian talking point?

0. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9814k2jlxko.amp

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#146

Works created by U.S. federal government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain, according to 17 U.S.C. § 105, except for classified or restricted information (but none of what he posted is classified or restricted)

> U.S. federal government employees as part of their official duties

“Official duties” is load bearing in this sentence.

If the work is found to have been improperly authorised, this DOGE bro is acting in his personal capacity. That means personal liability for his actions and lawbreaking.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#147

Well I can tell you the Python code was written with the help of an AI

[flagged]

What do you mean? I don't write code with AI because figuring out how to code things is not what takes a lot of time in my job. That's the fun bit, why would I automate it? What takes time is coming to alignment with the team on what problem we are solving, figuring out what is possible, and aligning on a solution based on the available tradeoffs. Is there some way AI is supposed to be able to help me with that?

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can one request all of the code this dude has written or is it as his discretion what is released to the public domain?

idk try to make a FOIA request

DOGE moving under the presidents executive office instead of as a separate agency seemed to be done for the purpose of shielding DOGE From FOIA and only subject to President Records Act

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Yeah it’s like looking at text and saying “oh they used a word processor”.

not really, unless your word processor outputs significant portions of text for you
Post reply on HN