Craigslist used to donate over $100,000 every single year. Not sure when that stopped. That is really what kept perl going between the years of 2010 and 2016 or so. The board was actually paying a couple of people to do maintenance on the core repository and code. I believe they still do that but obviously due to deficits that is going to get difficult. It's sad when so many companies are dependent upon perl, but don…
And that's the flaw of the open source business model. You develop something for free, make it available to everyone for free, allow them to modify use and misuse as they wish. Every single step is your conscious decision. And then, you beg for donations, and complain that people are not donating? Doesn't make sense. If you don't want to work for free, just charge for it.
DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
141–150 of 213 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#142A: This is great! Perl is much maligned but a fantastic Swiss army chainsaw and still runs so much critical infrastructure. B: I find it concerning that $25k is a notable donation; is the Foundation doing that poorly? I would have hoped this number to have two more digits in it for it to be a front page worthy item.
I'm surprised to learn that Perl is still used. Obviously there will always be legacy code to maintain but these days I can't even remember the last time Perl was mentioned in casual conversation amongst my peers unless we're sharing war stories from the 90s. These days when we find ourselves needing to write a script our first go-to would be bash, and if we need more features or if it's going to be complex enough to…
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#143Craigslist used to donate over $100,000 every single year. Not sure when that stopped. That is really what kept perl going between the years of 2010 and 2016 or so. The board was actually paying a couple of people to do maintenance on the core repository and code. I believe they still do that but obviously due to deficits that is going to get difficult. It's sad when so many companies are dependent upon perl, but don…
And that's the flaw of the open source business model. You develop something for free, make it available to everyone for free, allow them to modify use and misuse as they wish. Every single step is your conscious decision. And then, you beg for donations, and complain that people are not donating? Doesn't make sense. If you don't want to work for free, just charge for it.
Perl was created by someone in their spare time away from their day job.
When he needed money he just wrote books and charged for those. Ironically the publisher of those books hired him to continue working on the _language_, and of course, write more books.
Makes total sense.
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s being phased out quite aggressively there. Turned out they had such a bad reputation for tech debt thru couldn’t hire people despite paying +50% median Amsterdam developer salaries.
I interviewed with them once. The worst ever interview with incapable rude interviewers, who didn't even know the answer to their questions. They came p with some bizarre offer which I'm glad I declined.
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#145Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been an open source maintainer (and still am to a smaller degree) and I think sneak is right. I'm happy for people to use things I create and release, and their use doesn't impose costs on me.
Their use doesn't, but from time to time they send in bug reports and feature requests, don't they? Where do you draw the line between extending your project and providing free labor to a for-profit company? Fixing bugs is less controversial, while finding solutions to issues arising in bespoke production environments, with short deadlines, is grueling work for which companies are usually gladly purchasing support co…
If you want to bountysource a solution do that. If you don’t want to fix an issue don’t.
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
And that's the flaw of the open source business model. You develop something for free, make it available to everyone for free, allow them to modify use and misuse as they wish. Every single step is your conscious decision. And then, you beg for donations, and complain that people are not donating? Doesn't make sense. If you don't want to work for free, just charge for it.
Open source is not a business model. Perl was created by someone in their spare time away from their day job. When he needed money he just wrote books and charged for those. Ironically the publisher of those books hired him to continue working on the _language_, and of course, write more books. Makes total sense.
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm surprised to learn that Perl is still used. For this year's London Perl & Raku workshop I shortlisted 70 companies to look for sponsorship. That was with minimal research and effort. These ranged from long term ("legacy") users of Perl to startups. From small companies to very large and profitable fintechs. I cover this briefly in the talk I gave at the end of the workshop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el7qH…
> Programming languages don't die, they just stop being talked about in favour of the shiny new ones. You're largely preaching to the choir, I don't disagree with anything you said. As a web application developer who got started professionally in the 1990s, I not only vividly remember Perl being everywhere, I actively wrote a lot of it. However, in my more recent experience, it is more likely to hear people talk abou…
There's a similar story around javascript - note how es6(?) introduced `"use strict"`. Old school javascript always struck me as a bit like crippled perl with really good vendor support.
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's an absolute technical liability to build anything new in Perl these days.
It's more of a technical liability to write anything new in Python. All of my old perl code still runs fine, all of my python code went unusable since. It's also extremely bloated.
Re: DuckDuckGo donates $25k to the Perl and Raku Foundation
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Open source is not a business model. Perl was created by someone in their spare time away from their day job. When he needed money he just wrote books and charged for those. Ironically the publisher of those books hired him to continue working on the _language_, and of course, write more books. Makes total sense.
nah, it was created for their day job in order to provide reliable quick to write code under difficult conditions