Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you view as inconsistencies are based around assumptions for how the underlying rules work and what happened that don’t necessarily apply. One of the more interesting science fiction short stories I read seemed to have very inconsistent time travel, but on closer reading you find the two different methods involved had two different sets of rules. It’s easy to say something is inconsistent, but any possible story…
When it comes to Harry Potter, > but on closer reading does not make the inconsistencies go away, but they multiply.
Again based on specific assumptions. The universe of possibilities includes very strange places.