Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that you can re-skin it at runtime with such a wide variety of skins and load such a variety of plugins puts modern software to shame.
I owe my entire career to the fact that Winamp added the ability to re-skin. I had just graduated graduate school for international economics, and was working for a government contractor who only hired me because I had a masters (they could charge the government more). Because of this, I literally had nothing to do and would just sit in the office. I eventually figured out an excuse to get my employer to buy Photosho…
Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
141–150 of 175 posts
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#142is there a good Mac port that supports newer, especially loss less, codecs?
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use the community update of Winamp, WACUP, and it's excellent. I've tried other media players but always come back here. I'm not even one of those people who likes the shitty visualisations, I just think the interface works perfectly. https://getwacup.com/
Have you checked out foobar2000? To me, it always felt like the true successor to Winamp.
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#144Twenty years too late for it to possibly matter, but it's still nice to see. Interesting that there's no mention of what licence the source is being released under - and it's only available following email enquiries, of all things. I'm surprised they're even bothering, at this point - the software's so obsolete that it's not like it has much in the way of value anymore beyond nostalgia.
I still use it for all of my locally stored MP3s. I haven't seen a music player in a long time that focused on playing music rather than being a media library.
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still use it for all of my locally stored MP3s. I haven't seen a music player in a long time that focused on playing music rather than being a media library.
Foobar2000?
Primarily it's just a player, potentially it's a lot.
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#146Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#147Twenty years too late for it to possibly matter, but it's still nice to see. Interesting that there's no mention of what licence the source is being released under - and it's only available following email enquiries, of all things. I'm surprised they're even bothering, at this point - the software's so obsolete that it's not like it has much in the way of value anymore beyond nostalgia.
I use the community update of Winamp, WACUP, and it's excellent. I've tried other media players but always come back here. I'm not even one of those people who likes the shitty visualisations, I just think the interface works perfectly. https://getwacup.com/
I cannot live without stuff like equalizers, visualization plugins, Last.FM scrobbing and even automated track "ripping" of radio stations.
It makes me so sad the state of current audio players like YouTube Music, Spotify, Tidal and the likes. featurewise they are so... bland. Millenials and GenZs just don't enjoy music the same way I used to enjoy it. Maybe it is because there so much of it now that it doesn't matter so much
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#148Notable mention on BEOS ... CL-Amp
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still waiting on KaZaA open source. Kids these days don't know what it's like trying to download a music video and end up watching someone getting beheaded.
I realize this is a joke, but can’t resist mentioning that LimeWire was (is?) open source (or at least used an open network in GnuTella)
Re: Winamp has announced that it is "opening up" its source code
#150Twenty years too late for it to possibly matter, but it's still nice to see. Interesting that there's no mention of what licence the source is being released under - and it's only available following email enquiries, of all things. I'm surprised they're even bothering, at this point - the software's so obsolete that it's not like it has much in the way of value anymore beyond nostalgia.
Literally just yesterday I was staring at Winamp's basic visualizer because I was trying to make something similar in my Godot game. I'm still not sure exactly what I'm missing, as I have the "gist" of the visualizer working, but it just doesn't look as smooth as Winamp's. I think I need slight persistence and the little effect with the 'caps' that slowly fall down for each column (right now mine looks too jittery).