Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s nowhere near the stature or notoriety of Princeton, Harvard, Yale, etc. It feels like you’re moving the goalpost. Anyway, maybe you should change the way you measure yourself.
How else would I? Seems pretty clear how society views people like me
Blockbuster Alzheimer's paper retracted by former Stanford president
141–143 of 143 posts
Re: Blockbuster Alzheimer's paper retracted by former Stanford president
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
How else would I? Seems pretty clear how society views people like me
I don't know what subset of society you live in, but the university you attended is not commonly brought up in America. If you're referring to your intellectual aptitude rather than the credentials attached to your name, just try to be a good person and do the best you can with what you've got.
yes, it is, and it's seen as a proxy for intellectual aptitude
And clearly since I have no intellectual aptitude...
Re: Blockbuster Alzheimer's paper retracted by former Stanford president
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know what subset of society you live in, but the university you attended is not commonly brought up in America. If you're referring to your intellectual aptitude rather than the credentials attached to your name, just try to be a good person and do the best you can with what you've got.
> but the university you attended is not commonly brought up in America. yes, it is, and it's seen as a proxy for intellectual aptitude And clearly since I have no intellectual aptitude...
You’re also conflating the perception of intellect with the actual possession of it. It seems like you don’t have much confident in your measure of either. Maybe find a therapist. Help with this is beyond the scope of HN comments.
There are countless people who have not attended a top tier college, e.g. people who might be regarded as “intellectually inferior” who are richer than you and I. Meditate on that.