Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

AI real-time human full-body photo generator

generated.photos

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

141–150 of 421 posts

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#141

Post by joker_minmax »

Is it just me or is something kind of weird about all the breasts on the example women? They all look really high-set - and combined with the fact other people have gotten back nudes from this tool (as shared in the comments below) - I'm thinking that the dataset they used here was really catered to a "certain" audience.

Edit to add: It's not fast, it's showing you repeats of stuff of already made in the first try. Which is probably why I got 5 men in tight pink shirts eating cake in a row. ???

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#142

Post by upwardbound »

UweSchmidt wrote: post #78
Planktonne wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just because it's hard to make a tool that can't be used in negative ways doesn't mean that it's a good idea to make a tool that (charitably) makes specifically negative uses easy and (uncharitably) is deliberately designed for them. Tool makes do err on the side of caution all the time - we **** out passwords so users don't share them as easily, we put safety catches in secateurs. "Build in safeguards against the ob…

- your critique is both vague, but at the same time touches a sensitive area, implying a wrongdoing by the tool authors that can't be refuted or fixed easily. What specifically bothers you? Consider that active Twitter discussions uncover and point out troublesome issues almost faster than the general public can understand and digest. - assuming you found an egregious issue, do you also double down on maintaining tha…

Peritract already called out a specific issue. The male and female options come with different sets of selectable poses, and some of the female poses are pornographic in nature. This promotes the objectification of women.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#143

Post by joker_minmax »

AmazingTurtle wrote: post #122

NSFW? Also.. WTF with their detection algorithm, this is easily abusable. This was the first image I was prompted with https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e65d5a8448b8000b5... I have not changed any of the parameters, they were automatically generated on /new

This is the thing that comes to you if you take too much Benadryl at noonday.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#145

Post by BiteCode_dev »

kortex wrote: post #62

Oh yeah, totally ready for prime time, hyper realistic, SFW filter works great, not at all hallucinations /massive_sarcasm Actually NSFW, not safe for sanity. That's...not how body parts work: https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e644f39c8c0400108... Prompt was "young woman with tattoos in miniskirt" really nothing crazy there. But perhaps the latent space with that particular pose is particularly raunchy.

It's very hard to filter NSFW content. Every site I tried, unstable diffusion, kawaix.com, Mage space, novel ai... They all have some content moderation on (to avoid CP, to keep payment processors happy...), but things leak.

Some are really bad at filtering. Kawaix is particularly terrible at it, because they are new, while mage have upped their game a lot but had many months to do so.

It feels like 2000' again, and it's the wild west.

Plus when you have a horde of teenagers having a whole summer to try prompts from their bed, you get serious pen testing sessions.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#146

Post by behringer »

mitthrowaway2 wrote: post #107
dragonwriter wrote: post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its terms of use of the site, you are offered use of their geneator in exchange for agreeing not to use it commercially. If you use it commercially, you are breaking those terms, which they will argue are an enforceable contract. Copyright has nothing to do with it.

But what if you use the generator, post the image in an allowed non-commercial context, and then I copy that image and use it commercially? I have no contract with the AI generator company, and you didn't violate yours; it would seem to me that the violation involved is a copyright violation.

100 percent legal to use the generated images as freely as you like in that case.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#147

Post by lelanthran »

oktwtf wrote: post #38

I always thought peak of popular culture had a bit of a negative effect on the body image of the rest. Now we’re going to let ai define the ideals… this might be slippery.

"Now"?

I doubt everyone is going to want to have six mangled fingers on one hand and a claw on the other.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#148

Post by GaggiX »

gwern wrote: post #126
GaggiX wrote: post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>they're too unstable', a widespread myth >See for example BigGAN I remember when you try training a BigGAN model on anime images, the quality was bad. Now look at this example, one single GPU, 1.5M images with a diffusion model: https://medium.com/@enryu9000/anifusion-diffusion-models-for... ,the difference in quality is absurd, you can say this or that is not true but the quality speak for itself, obtaining good qu…

> I remember when you try training a BigGAN model on anime images, the quality was bad Because there was a bug in the code, in a part unrelated to the GAN itself. > the difference in quality is absurd Yes, it does help to train on anime with code that isn't buggy. (BTW, Skylion was getting good results with GANs on anime similarly restricted to centered figures like those samples, he just refuses to ever publish anyt…

So you believe that without the bug you would be able to come close to the quality of the diffusion model I have linked? I'm not even asking about using the same compute (1 GPU for ~1 month) but if you just believe BigGAN can come close to that in general.

Also the bug is probably related to the added complexity of training a GAN model in comparison to a diffusion model.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#149

Post by 14 »

kortex wrote: post #62

Oh yeah, totally ready for prime time, hyper realistic, SFW filter works great, not at all hallucinations /massive_sarcasm Actually NSFW, not safe for sanity. That's...not how body parts work: https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e644f39c8c0400108... Prompt was "young woman with tattoos in miniskirt" really nothing crazy there. But perhaps the latent space with that particular pose is particularly raunchy.

I've spent the last hour trying to coax it to spit out nsfw images and it definitely is not safe for work lol. I wouldn't even want to post some of the seeds I generated. Nudity is not prevented in this generator.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#150

Post by basch »

dragonwriter wrote: post #123
tomcam wrote: post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not trying to be combative, but I don't see the difference?

Real AI imagegen workflows very often have more input from the human creating the image than a text prompt.

seems a little circular semantically. if it has significant human input its human generated moreso than ai generated, in which case we are saying the same thing.
Post reply on HN