Live data from Hacker News

Keep Linux Open and Free–We Can’t Afford Not To

oracle.com

141–142 of 142 posts

Re: Keep Linux Open and Free–We Can’t Afford Not To

#141
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Oracle does maintain Solaris, which would seem to me to entail a much larger support burden than Red Hat's stewardship of their enterprise Linux distribution. Solaris was effectively killed off in 2017 when Oracle laid off most people working on it. And Open Solaris is dead too.

Illumos also effectively died when most of their corporate support switched to Linux. Had nothing to do with Oracle. That said, I believe OpenIndiana is still being maintained, but their release cycle is rather slow.

Rumours of our death are, as ever, greatly exaggerated. We continue to maintain the core OS facilities provided by illumos and the organisations behind distributions like SmartOS and OmniOS continue to ship maintained, supported software to a mixture of community and commercial users.

Re: Keep Linux Open and Free–We Can’t Afford Not To

#142
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just to make sure, you are talking about RH resignation from the FSF? https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-statement-about-richa...

Yes, more or less: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26596378 After Selam Gano's hate piece there was a crusade against RMS, with many media outlets repeating untrue information ("Stallman defends Epstein" etc.). And then Red Hat/IBM decided to chime in. In spite of the fact they had been profiting from his work and will continue to do so. Historically, RMS and RH had good relations, though: https://www.linuxtoday…

RMS is a complex character. However, I tend to side with Bradley M. Kuhn's view.

http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2019/10/15/fsf-rms.html

Post reply on HN