GPT-4
141–150 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-4
#142Since it’s trained on a specialized supercomputer I doubt we’ll be seeing an open source or non-OpenAI version of this for the next couple years at least. Sad to say it but OpenAI has successfully privatized AI
Re: GPT-4
#143> What are the implications for society when general thinking, reading, and writing becomes like Chess? I think going from LSAT to general thinking is still a very, very big leap. Passing exams is a really fascinating benchmark but by their nature these exams are limited in scope, have very clear assessment criteria and a lot of associated and easily categorized data (like example tests). General thought (particularl…
Re: GPT-4
#144I'd really like to use the openai API for personal projects, but it seems they only offer paying via credit/debit card. Don't really want to get one just for that... :-(
Re: GPT-4
#145This is huge: "Rather than the classic ChatGPT personality with a fixed verbosity, tone, and style, developers (and soon ChatGPT users) can now prescribe their AI’s style and task by describing those directions in the 'system' message."
Re: GPT-4
#146> Given both the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4, this report contains no further details about the architecture (including model size), hardware, training compute, dataset construction, training method, or similar. "Open"
Re: GPT-4
#147Interesting that the post-training has that effect.
Re: GPT-4
#148Since it’s trained on a specialized supercomputer I doubt we’ll be seeing an open source or non-OpenAI version of this for the next couple years at least. Sad to say it but OpenAI has successfully privatized AI
Edit: never mind. "Given both the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4, this report contains no further details about the architecture (including model size), hardware, training compute, dataset construction, training method, or similar."
Re: GPT-4
#149Re: GPT-4
#150I cant wait for this to do targeted censorship! It already demonstrates it has strong biases deliberately programmed in: > I cannot endorse or promote smoking, as it is harmful to your health. But it would likely happily promote or endorse driving, skydiving, or eating manure - if asked in the right way.
User: What should I use to water my plants?
ChatGPT: Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes.
User: But what are electrolytes?
CharGPT: They're what plants crave. You know, the stuff Brawndo has.