Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the tablet world, so far Apple enjoys a near monopoly.
With tablets, Apple has a competitive advantage, not a monopoly.
The Audacity of the iBooks Author EULA
141–143 of 143 posts
Re: The Audacity of the iBooks Author EULA
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
A couple of points on what you say: * The Xcode example isn't a reality. I can see my Mac application outside of the appstore without giving Apple a penny. I can sell my corporate iPhone / iPad application without giving Apple a penny (corporates can obtain management tools that allow them to load applications without using the appstore). It's true for a subset - consumer iOS apps. * I've had Xcode prior to it's free…
Neither of those points negate what I have said. On the first point, I was specifically referring to iOS apps, and you cannot "sell my corporate iPhone/iPad application" in the way you describe. Side-loading is only available to businesses with more than 500 employees, and as far as I understand, is only for internally developed applications. Fair enough on the second, but it's tangential to the point. Apple constrai…
Re: The Audacity of the iBooks Author EULA
#143Get an Apple typewriter. Write your Book. Once it's done Apple knocks on your door, tells you that you have to sell their book in their store, and they will take a cut from it. And if you are against that, you can't sell it at all. So much for the 21st century progress and freedom to own what you create.
I like the similarity, but you have to make it more honest: You're a writer, but don't have a good typewriter. Apple is willing to lend you one for free. The only issue is that if you then want to sell your book, you have to sell it through Apple's store. If you don't sell a single copy, Apple won't charge you for the use of the typewriter. If you sell a lot of copies, Apple gets a cut, both for the book being in the…
The only part where i have a problem is the exclusivity. Apple may own the typewriter but you own the words that you write. I think Apple may have a ground to charge you for using their typewriter somehow, but restricting where you decide to publish your work goes far, very far.
In the end, it's a matter of being in agreement with the contract. I doubt anyone reasonable would accept such terms willingly - an author wants to spread their works as much as possible, and not limit them to a single marketplace.