Live data from Hacker News

The Hollywood sign debuted 100 years ago

latimes.com

141–142 of 142 posts

Re: The Hollywood sign debuted 100 years ago

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That may be true in your specific case, but is most definitely not true in general (your house also probably costs $3 million). Nonetheless, NONE of what you say justifies single family home MANDATES (as well as minimum parking mandates, minimum setbacks, maximum heights, etc.). Let people build what they want to, at the price they want to, and everyone will be happier. This is the United States we're talking about,…

My house costs way less than $3 million. The restrictions exist because people want to ruin neighborhoods like mine. We made laws to prevent it. For every sane YIMBY who wants to build livable density, there seems to also be an unhinged person who thinks everyone should be forced to live in tower blocks. Many such people are in this thread. I used to think it was a strawman argument, but those people really do exist,…

Not one person in this thread thinks everyone should be forced to live in high-rise buildings, or in any particular type of building, and no one made any such argument. I certainly wouldn't want to live in such a place. All people want is the freedom to choose the set of tradeoffs that suit them (because everything has a tradeoff), and the freedom to build what people actually want. Forcing people to live in one particular style of low-rise building is the status quo and is what you are proposing be forced upon everyone.

There's a big difference between high-rise and mid-rise, and all three can peacefully coexist. If you had watched the video I linked earlier you would have seen many examples of this. I will link it here again for convenience.

Population Density 101: A Visual Guide to Suburbs and Skyscrapers by Oh The Urbanity!: https://youtu.be/y3XoUBzfXps

Re: The Hollywood sign debuted 100 years ago

#142
post #99

It was in a bad shape when Hugh Heffner moved to LA, he started a campaign to get it restored IIRC. He did a lot civil rights and ending segregation too. The southern TV stations objected to him showing black entertainers and talking to them in his TV show, he stood by his values. And he gave a voice to Martin Luther King and Malcolm X in Playboy. Source: the documentary about him on Amazon Prime, highly recommended.

Also an interesting watch is the A&E documentary about the dark side of Hefner and Playboy: https://www.aetv.com/shows/secrets-of-playboy It’s 12 parts and honestly could have easily been 10 if not less but it’s always worth exploring the duality of the man. No denying his social progressivism but he definitely wasn’t all shining light and I’m suspicious of anything that paints him as if he were.

Thanks for the tip. Thats why i love this site so much. You can get a very differentiated picture here.
Post reply on HN