Live data from Hacker News

Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

help.twitter.com

141–150 of 790 posts

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#141

Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!

I mean I don’t think Musks critics are asking for the government to intervene here (well, other than those pointing out it might violates EU regs).

I was pretty cynical about his purchase and Im not terribly happy about being proven right. My hope is that he gets bored with it, sells it, and it gets a boring new owner that’s less ideological.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#144

(from another thread) Any attorneys want to weigh in on whether - or when - this becomes an anti-competitive/anti-trust concern, either in the US (FTC) or the EU? Related reading: * Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Article 102, on abusive conduct by companies that have a dominant position in a market: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust/procedures... . Any EU resident can file a co…

I suspect this would factor heavily into any such concern-

"Additionally, we allow paid advertisement/promotion for any of the prohibited social media platforms."

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#146
post #123
post #19

"Thin-skinned narcissist buys criticism machine." This is not "free speech absolutism" in the slightest. It's not even business-savvy. Elon's mask has truly cracked, and he proves he is nothing but a febrile mind who has bought into his own hype.

Quoted post unavailable.

I’ve definitely linked to my profiles on other sites before and never been banned or even warned.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#147

They are not banning links to other platforms: " We recognize that certain social media platforms provide alternative experiences to Twitter, and allow users to post content to Twitter from these platforms. In general, any type of cross-posting to our platform is not in violation of this policy, even from the prohibited sites listed above. "

Yes they are and they explicitly say as much:

> we will remove any free promotion of prohibited 3rd-party social media platforms, such as linking out (i.e. using URLs) to any of the below platforms on Twitter

Your quote is referring to cross-posting from other sites to Twitter, not linking.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#148

Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!

It's not reasonable for someone claiming free speech absolutism & unbiased moderation. You do make a good point by pointing out Musk could have just built his own social media platform instead of crying about the moderation and blowing $44B on Twitter, only to fail to make good on his promise of free speech.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#149

Banning links to Facebook? Really? This flying by the seat of the pants moderation style reminds me of friends in highschool running their own phpBB instances and IRC channels.. Also, Telegram, Discord, Tumblr aren't listed? Lol.

Actually only links to profiles calling for follow. If I understand correctly.

I don't think you're understanding correctly. It doesn't even allow link aggregators such as link tree, on posts or bios.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#150

"Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon, Truth Social, Tribel, Post and Nostr" Thanks for the list Elon, I'll make sure to check those out!

Funny to see Nostr on the list just 2 days after Jack funded them

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jack-dorsey-gives-decentraliz...

Post reply on HN