Live data from Hacker News

Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

washingtonpost.com

141–150 of 1001 posts

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#141
post #65

I'd be pissed off if I were a TSLA stock owner. Is Twitter paying Tesla to contract out these employees for their work? Otherwise, it's tons of thousands of dollars Tesla is pissing away on behalf of the CEO's side-hustle.

It would be better to find out more details before having an emotional reaction.

Maybe they're Tesla engineers, but they're moonlighting on Twitters dime?

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#142

I was thinking the "30-60" day time window may be a somewhat subtle way of catching out engineers who haven't written a thing in that amount of time. that would be one way to identify low-performers. not unproblematic by a long shot, but quick, and probably somewhat effective. and it wouldn't require any deep knowledge of twitter's codebase on the part of the reviewers.

Quick! Force push branch with fake historic commits from everyone in the team!

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Distributed systems, the large-scale and spread-out network that Twitter is composed of, are not the automaker’s specialty, the person said. You can giggle along with the anonymous source who wasn't involved if you wish but Tesla collects a rather large amount of telemetry and has all manner of micro services crap internally just like Twitter. I imagine the Twitter codebase itself is a farcical Rube Goldberg machin…

> I imagine the Twitter codebase itself is a farcical Rube Goldberg machine. I'd presume Tesla's codebase is exactly the same.

Absolutely correct. :)

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#144
post #57

Surprised how sceptical all the comments here are. Dick or not the guy has a talent for building companies

Can you elaborate on this argument? I don't really understand his companies as "well built" in any reasonable sense that I can identify. "His companies make him and many of his investors wealthy" sure, no disagreement from me. But "well built" is a different metric, and I think that's highly arguable.

Well for one, they actually achieve meaningful change in the world.

Half the people here work for companies that do nothing but steal my latest PII from my grandma’s contact list “yes share contacts with recipe app” to sell me ads.

I have 3 cars in my garages right now that only exist because he pushed EVs. I have a boat with starlink.

The dude has done more to improve my life than any of the FAANG jerkoffs, and I’m thankful for that

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#145
post #65

I'd be pissed off if I were a TSLA stock owner. Is Twitter paying Tesla to contract out these employees for their work? Otherwise, it's tons of thousands of dollars Tesla is pissing away on behalf of the CEO's side-hustle.

Um... free PR for TSLA which helps with recruiting for both organizations?

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#146

I’m still looking for a concise term for “someone who claims to be an expert but immediately reveals beyond any doubt that they have no clue what they’re saying, simply by opening their mouth on the subject.” Having Tesla engineers over to review Twitter code is definitely that. It’s ridiculous.

A “dilettante”?

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#147

This is pretty standard procedure when a company gets bought. The new owners will conduct a review and decide who to keep and who to get rid of. They have probably been given a target of how many people they want to lay off and are evaluating who is worth keeping. It’s not worth staying at a company that gets acquired, you’ll either get laid off or be asked to do the same work with less people, and awful morale.

You say "the new owners" but Tesla is not the new owner. Is it really standard procedure for employees from another company of the same CEO to do labor on the CEO's new company? And is printing out code really standard? Like, if you have the prerogative to review company code, why wouldn't you rather just use code tools on a computer, such as Git?

I wouldn't be quick to dismiss the idea that this is a show.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#148
post #3

> One former Tesla engineer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly describe the matter but was not involved, said Tesla engineers would have trouble capably assessing Twitter’s code. Distributed systems, the large-scale and spread-out network that Twitter is composed of, are not the automaker’s specialty, the person said. > The “idea of Elon being flanked by his Tesla engineers reviewing Twitter code is…

> Distributed systems, the large-scale and spread-out network that Twitter is composed of, are not the automaker’s specialty, the person said. You can giggle along with the anonymous source who wasn't involved if you wish but Tesla collects a rather large amount of telemetry and has all manner of micro services crap internally just like Twitter. I imagine the Twitter codebase itself is a farcical Rube Goldberg machin…

> the answer will be zero lines of code.

Ugh, I bet you're exactly right..

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What hubris to think that your system is so complex that other engineers couldn't understand it.

Also what hubris of the Twitter engineers, who seem to be in this thread, thinking anything they built was that special. Your video player somehow managed to be worse than Reddit , the perennial joke of web dev. Not to mention “something went wrong” again and again, maybe by the 4th reload would a linked tweet actually show up for me. I’m on 25 gig symmetrical fiber with <10ms to my local AWS hub, FWIW

Video player works fine for me, and I'm on 20 gig symmetrical fiber with 8ms to my local Azure hub. Maybe check your firewall settings?
Post reply on HN