Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty much yes. Cost is more than just monetary. There are significant indirect costs as well.
> There are significant indirect costs as well. Can you elaborate on these costs? Do you have knowledge of JS's internal needs and resources to suggest a better alternative? They are not just hapless consumers of a dead language; they actively maintain it and invest in it because it works well for them. The language itself gives them the kind of guarantees they want in their work, and their work on the language and s…
Nowhere did I mention that Ocaml was a dead language or a dying language. I simply stated that there are insurmountable switching costs which incentivizes them to contribute to the larger Ocaml community.