Live data from Hacker News

Omega Swatch Speedmaster

swatch.com

141–142 of 142 posts

Re: Omega Swatch Speedmaster

#141
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn’t a Patek even more impossible to obtain than a Rolex?

That's not my experience as long you don't want the Nautilus etc.

But can't the same be said for Rolex as long as you're not after their more popular stainless steel sport models?

While not "easy" per se, you could probably score a precious metal or two-tone Rolex at a dealer without a ridiculous amount of difficulty. I'd say you could get a SS Oyster Perpetual or DateJust (barring certain exceptions - i.e. the Tiffany dial) without too much difficulty too, unless things have changed drastically in the past few months.

Re: Omega Swatch Speedmaster

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm more like a TAG Heuer guy, so. Partially because I could never justify Omega's prices for myself. I do love mechanical watches, once I had a chat with specialized limited-edition mechanical watches dealer. Man, did he have nice ones. He also appreciated those non-limited edition ones being worn everyday. I would never ever buy a new Rolex. Maybe a really old one, an antique, but not a new one. To cite the famous…

I’ve never seen a nice looking Rolex. I owned a tag, it was partially made from rubber, it was a formula 1 series watch, the rubber perished, was bad.

Do you remember more about the exact model? I can see the band being made of rubber (which is a wear part, and you just buy a replacement for), but the watch case itself should be steel and last decades. I'm not aware of any rubber-cased Tag watches.

> I’ve never seen a nice looking Rolex.

Fwiw, this is not a commonly held opinion. You can't argue taste, but most would disagree. What kind of watches do you like the looks of?

Post reply on HN