I’ll offer up my one bag take that’s very much against the mainstream of one bag aficionados. I love traveling light, but think the carefully curated list of expensive branded items are counterproductive. I’d much rather the bag and everything in it to be functional, ugly anonymous and replaceable. If the bag gets stolen, I should be able to walk into the nearest mall and replace everything that was in it without a s…
Your approach seems a little like applying certain ultra-light hiking philosophies to one bag travel. E.g., Don't buy a fancy usb-powered travel toothbrush - buy a plain manual toothbrush and cut off the handle to save space and weight.
OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
141–150 of 213 posts
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#142Laundry is one of the biggest hassles of travel, IMHO. Hotels charge extortionate prices to launder your clothes. Many cities don't have self-service laundromats, and even if they do, you don't feel like wasting two hours using one. I personally do not like washing things in my room, but if you do, there you go. What I've found, though, is that it's easy and cheap to get someone else to do it for you. In Sydney, I go…
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One-bagging is also a poor choice for business travel, since you likely want a smaller computer bag so you don't have to use your much larger "one bag" as your office bag. I just keep a very small shoulder bag inside my one-bag that fits my Macbook and acts as a walk-around. In travel mode, it's used to compartmentalize. Likewise, my wife has a small ~15L daypack inside her one-bag that is empty and rolled-up in tr…
There are expandable backpacks that are business looking when compressed.
I went through a Timbuk2 phase but this old Mountainsmith bag (nee a big fanny pack, now with added strap) works better for me these days.
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#144My favorite travel hack: Wool shirts and wool socks. They need washing less often so you pack less clothing. And, showering with hand-sanitizer on arm pits. https://www.woolly.clothing/collections/190-gsm-shirts/produ... https://unboundmerino.com/collections/socks https://www.smartertravel.com/unbound-merino-womens-v-neck-r...
They also dry very quickly when you do wash them. Very convenient for hotel/hostel sink laundry days. My first longer-than-a-weekend trip was 2 weeks and I took cotton undershirts (mistakes were made). Since they tend to pick up odor quickly (at least the way I sweat) I had several days worth and they took a while to dry. Switching to wool shirts, I could pack 3 and do laundry once on the trip and no one would notice…
The part of travelling with one bag that I don't like is having to do laundry more often.
Like, I gain 30 minutes by not waiting for luggage at the airport, but sometimes that offset by the time spent doing laundry.
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly, which is what makes the mainstream approach very brittle and difficult to recover from failure. If even replacing the bag is a major project, then my vacation can easily be ruined. You say “nice onebag setup,” I say “white elephant that wants me to spend my whole trip focused on it.”
planning everything around rare failures seems silly to me. If an expensive item has good value, adds utility over a less expensive option, and can still be functionally replaced in case of rare failure mode, i don’t see any white elephant in that picture.
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#146It's interesting to me that GoRuck keeps showing up in the comments. I've seen it show up in several other contexts (geocaching, Ingress, etc.), and ... It seems like a "lifestyle brand", but are they also focused on one-bag ergonomics? Not at all skeptical, just looking for an accessible intro to GoRuck.
The main thing that might make you not want them is that they're very unstructured. They're a big empty box on your back with only minimal pockets, and if you want to impose any separation on gear you put in there you're going to have to do it yourself via other bags (e.g. packing cubes). This is in contrast to brands like Tom Bihn who have a bunch of specialized compartments to help you split stuff up. This is, of course, very much a matter of taste.
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are expandable backpacks that are business looking when compressed.
I probably want a small bag with things I want in the airport/on the plane anyway. The bag that I normally use--which I've had for decades and use for almost everything--takes very little space by itself. So it makes sense for me to use it for compartmentalization even if I stick it in my carryon. I went through a Timbuk2 phase but this old Mountainsmith bag (nee a big fanny pack, now with added strap) works better f…
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#148Both times I took the same 19-liter backpack. The primary thing that this did for me is it forced me to be very selective about exactly what it was I really needed to bring with me. I bought the latest and greatest cell phone with the best camera on the market, and I used the phone for all pictures, navigation, and all the great things modern phones do. All guides were in the form of audio files that I would play through my Bluetooth earbuds. I was able to pay for almost everything using my phone -- except the Tokyo subway. (Seriously, Japan, let's get with the times).
The cell phone pictures turned out just fine. Sure they weren't emaculate works of visual art you might get from a dedicated $1k camera with interchangeable lens and what not, but they were more than adequate, and it was really easy to just whip out the phone and snap a picture no matter where we were or what we were doing. That ended up getting us some really ad-hoc pictures that added a ton of character to our trip album. Look back on the pictures now, I really have no regrets about that, and I still wouldn't add a separate camera to my (very parsimonious) list of things to stuff in the backpack.
For each trip I had 5 pairs of undies, 4 pairs of Merino wool socks, 3 Merino wool tshirts, 2 pairs of board shorts, 1 pair of pants, and 1 pair of shoes. I brought a few ounces of liquid detergent, which at one point put me in a ridiculous position where I was washing my clothes in the sink of a ritzy downtown hotel in Paris. I had a combo battery/USB Anker charger that works on 120v and 240v circuits with some plug adapters. Worked fine everywhere in England, Europe, and Japan. No laptop -- the phone can run a terminal app just fine if I really needed to SSH home for whatever reason. And I'm not going to be wanting to bang out novels or anything while I'm traveling. (I did buy a Logitech Bluetooth keyboard ahead of time just in case, but I ended up deciding it wasn't worth the weight and space). Google Fi for the carrier, which worked great and was cheap. A synthetic down jacket and GoreTex shell took care of variations in weather, and they both compressed down to fit in one of the zipper pockets. Carabiner clips ended up being pretty useful once in a while. Bought an umbrella from a corner store in whatever city I was at if I felt I needed one.
Both going there and back I'd get flagged for a manual bag inspection at the airport. I guess traveling overseas with no checked luggage is a security flag? The worker would open the zipper, see the top part of a compressed mass of clothes, shrug, and then close it up again. I didn't care about the "boarding crunch" to try to jocky for overhead space. The backpack easily slid under the seat in front of me with plenty of foot-room too, although I'd just pull the backpack out after liftoff.
While the backpack had only 19 liters of volume, it was pretty dense, and so carrying it around for more than an hour or so would start to get tiring. The padded waist clip helped, but occasionally there were times I wouldn't have complained if I could set it on the ground and wheel it for a while. But then there were times in train stations when we would zip around tourists heaving several huge suitcases around and jockying for space to put them on the cars. When we stopped places on the way to the hotel we never had to stress out about leaving our stuff in rental cars to get stolen. Just grab the backpacks and wear them to wherever we were going. Most of the time, we would unload all the extra clothes at the hotel room and head out with mostly-empty backpacks at our destinations.
One time we decided spur-of-the-moment to watch a play in London, and the only shoes I had were my black sneakers. I had a button-up synthetic shirt (rayon and cotton I think) and a dark pair of pants, so I mostly "fit in," as long as you didn't look to closely at my feet. But at the end of the day, I didn't really care that much, and I wouldn't have tried to haul around multiple pairs of shoes just on the off-chance I'd want to go to the theatre and be "completely" dressed up.
In short, I'm hooked on the 19-liter backpack way of traveling. The space and weight scarcity really forces you to be thoughtful about exactly what you really need to take with you, and you can focus on the experience rather than stress out about all your stuff. (I'm sure there's a broader analogy that can apply to all of life here.)
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#149Ultralight travel is the best. I was first inspired by this post from 2007: https://tim.blog/2007/07/11/how-to-travel-the-world-with-10-... ... In the 15 years since then I've gone all over the world with just an 25-liter backpack. The biggest benefit I enjoy was the freedom to move from place to place without being tied down to a hostel/hotel/town just because "my stuff is there." Oh and it's a lot easier to sprint…
Re: OneBag: The Art and Science of Travelling Light
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had an almost-empty container clearly marked 150ml (or something) confiscated because it was.. marked more than 100ml. Also razor blades, I don't know if they're supposed to be allowed, being only about an inch long, but nope - shaving with expensive junk or growing a holiday beard are the only approved options!
> almost-empty container clearly marked 150ml (or something) confiscated That's correct according to the TSA rules. https://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/files/liquidsrule_example-... (We can wrap ourselves around many axles debating the utility of these rules, but that's at least a correct interpretation of the rule.)
I can buy a >100ml container post-security, or even take an empty one through, and decant there, so what's that protecting against?