Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Release 89.0

mozilla.org

141–150 of 487 posts

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#141
The Firefox UI team keeps rotating the same chairs, but hasn't touched the awful bookmark UIs for five+ years.

They're just lucky that Edge-Chrome's odd floating Favorites box is what it is, or they'd have the worst offering (and even in Edge-Chrome you can open the Chrome-like Bookmarks tab).

I was legitimately hopeful that everyone would just copy Chrome's very functional and clean Bookmarks approach, but I guess we have to keep dragging around this kludge from the 1990s.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#143
Sigh. Another UI overhaul, another reduction in information density. I just updated on Windows, and all menus (context and otherwise) have their items spaced remarkably far apart. How come they switched to native context menus on Mac, but away from native menus on Windows?

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#144
Personally I really like the updated design. I switched back to Firefox a while ago because I get weird rendering artifacts in Safari.

The only thing I didn't like was the way the UI looked, so this update comes as a very welcome surprise for me.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#145
Random Firefox UI observations:

- Tabs have been redesigned to look like buttons. Why? Surely altering the appearance of an interface component or control to reflect something it isn't is basic UX 101? And why remove the outline of non-selected tabs? Isn't "affordance" of components also UX 101?

- Themes: Isn't one of the goals for a web browser to minimise the "chrome" (the toolbars, tabs, status bar) so that as much of the browser page is visible? Theming a thin toolbar strip seems a bit pointless. (It's pointless in Chrome too, why copy them?)

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#146
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UI/UX team that works on this likely aren't backend coders. They can either fire the team or put them to use, but reassigning them random C++/Rust tasks probably isn't possible.

To be perfectly blunt it doesn't matter what a team is doing. They paid $X million to "design resources" and directed those resources at the redesign featured in this release. Instead they could have paid that to backend, other UX initiatives, the extension team, the privacy team... I understand that you can't swing resources around freely in the short term but you don't have a bunch of designers sitting around by ac…

Good UI developers are incredibly hard to find. If they let them go, it will take a couple years to get a new team assembled and integrated into Mozilla.

I agree with the idea of other UX initiatives though. They could definitely have the team work on other parts of Firefox even though that isn't as immediately visible to all users.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#147
post #24

> "We’ve redesigned and modernized the core experience to be cleaner, more inviting, and easier to use." Why does the UI change with every single Firefox release? I find myself having to re-adjust every time a new update is shipped. What's wrong with having a consistent experience that survives for more than 6 months? It's just a URL bar, and a bunch of tabs. Just leave it be already.

Don't be over dramatic. It's still tabs and an URL bar, there's nothing to adjust to.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#148
This is really exciting, I've been waiting forever for elastic scrolling. It seems like they fixed a majority of the issues that made Firefox feel awkward and out of place on MacOS. I might actually switch over now!
Post reply on HN