Live data from Hacker News

Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

ercot.com

141–150 of 597 posts

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#141
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My house normally uses 70kwh/day. We have an electric heater and with this cold weather we were on track to use 150-200kwh day. At $5/kwh for 5 days of 200kwh due to the cold puts me at $5,000.

Holy cow! How in the world do you use that much? My old house in Colorado would use ~350kwh/month. Swap out that electric heater for a heat pump asap!

A don't think a heat pump would help them in this weather.

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#142

Here's their news release about it: http://www.ercot.com/news/releases/show/225151 That links to this PDF which describes their emergency procedures: http://www.ercot.com/content/wcm/lists/200198/EEA_OnePager_u... Basically, there are 3 levels of response: (1) Reserves below 2,300 MW: get more power, including from other grids. (2) Reserves below 1,750 MW: interrupt power to industrial customers (who've contractually…

Uh, were at 1210 mw right now

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, not really. As far as I'm aware HVDC links are more efficient than AC links (even with AC/DC/AC conversion).

It looks like a tradeoff. The only place in the world doing a significant amount of long distance transmission is China. Their wind and coal resources are in the west, and demand is in the east, and transporting coal by rail just further increases air quality problems in the east. Based on what they are implementing, HVDC make sense at 800km+, and AC for shorter runs. I think it comes down to HVDC requires less condu…

You also have reactive losses with AC.

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#144
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's because they lose lift though. For a turbine, that wouldn't matter (at least directly). I have to imagine it's really the overall weight or the unbalanced weight not being good for the bearings and such. Not to mention a blade flinging a piece of ice off when it starts to melt...

The wind turbine spins because of an analog of lift - without “lift” it won’t spin. There’s also the issue of balance.

>The wind turbine spins because of an analog of lift - without “lift” it won’t spin.

Thinking about it, that does make perfect sense, but just intuitively, I would think say, making a blade that had a flat side perpendicular to the wind direction would work, because the force can still be imparted to the blade. I can also intuitively surmise why that wouldn't work for a plane though.

When dealing with a plane, you want to generate force perpendicular to the wing (i.e. up when the plane is moving horizontally), but in a turbine you want the force to be in the same direction as the blade is moving. I feel like I must be missing something.

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#145
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The insulation thing is weird because better insulation saves you in the summer too. I guess it's just the construction fixed cost. Electric heat seems like a weird compromise though considering the gulf of Mexico..

Electric heat is great if you don't use heat consistently. Relatively inexpensive up front, low maintenance, etc.

Central air and a natural gas furnace are both on the same duct system and low maintenance.

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those prices are far below normal prices. Normal is 28-50 cents in places like San Diego ( https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/energy-green/s... ).

My power comes from, I believe, a nuclear plant in Wisconsin. $0.098 per kW-h, with $15 a month connection fee.

Wi has a lot of coal by the lake, where is there a nuke? Chicago was almost all nukes at one point

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#148
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct. The summer of 2019 was no wind. Today’s problem is ice.

I'm guessing ice is such a rare problem the turbines in Texas aren't equipped to handle it. Not that turbines can't de-ice themselves, right? Surely if they can operate in the North Sea, they can operate in West and South Texas, yeah?

According to this article[1] you can equip them with cold weather packages that will allow them to operate down to -30C. I am guessing they wouldn't install those packages on turbines in Texas

[1] https://energynews.us/2019/02/27/midwest/wind-turbine-shutdo...

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#149

Here's their news release about it: http://www.ercot.com/news/releases/show/225151 That links to this PDF which describes their emergency procedures: http://www.ercot.com/content/wcm/lists/200198/EEA_OnePager_u... Basically, there are 3 levels of response: (1) Reserves below 2,300 MW: get more power, including from other grids. (2) Reserves below 1,750 MW: interrupt power to industrial customers (who've contractually…

Uh, were at 1210 mw right now

When I go to that page I see "Operating Reserves: 3,126 MW"

Re: Ercot nearly at capacity for Texas power grid

#150
post #8

It is kind of weird and worrisome that such a large entity doesn't use https Look at the weird error message... https://www.ercot.com/ The rest of the site appears to be http only What's funny is that they do have a valid certificate for their error message page.

On the other hand, the page is loading in single digit ms for me, even when I'm sure it's getting 10000x the usual traffic. Honestly I'll take it.
Post reply on HN