Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would say, do not underestimate the value of art. The article described an artist that made is own paint from the pigment. He painted a depiction of an ancient bird, its absolutely beautiful. This use was not a waste of resources and will in fact last much much longer than any screen made in 2021. Its arguable that using precious resources for products that last less than 20 years, in many cases less than 5 years,…
I agree that using such a pigment for a small number of art objects would certainly be justified, like also the use of gold in art objects or jewelry, instead of its more valuable technical uses, for which there are no alternatives, e.g. in protecting electrical contacts from corrosion or in semiconductor metallization. However, if instead of using this pigment in a few valuable paintings, it would be used in a high…
Just like a high number of ephemeral smartphone screens would be a waste?