Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no idea where you get 400ms on average. Here's the log for a blog post page of my site. It's a heavy and big page, it's on ruby 1.8.7 and rails 3, and I haven't done anything to make it faster. I could cache most of it rather easily. Completed 200 OK in 205ms (Views: 168.9ms | ActiveRecord: 23.2ms | Sphinx: 9.6ms) edit: a couple of notes. This is running on a cheap vps and would be faster on a real server. It…
? If you read the article, you can see that after their upgrade, the average time spent in ruby per page is 400ms.
Re: Rails 3 Performance - Not Good Enough
#141It sounded to me as if you believed this was typical for a rails site. Maybe I read it wrong, but it isn't typical for a rails app that I've ever done.