Live data from Hacker News

Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

michaeleisen.org

141–145 of 145 posts

Re: Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

#141
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you know it's downvoted? I sort of miss the karma number next to each post :(

You can see your own Karma

Oh... That was really stupid of me! I didn't notice the responder (you) was the same person!

Thanks.

Re: Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

#142
post #90
post #21

A similar thing happened to me as a seller. I saw that one of my old textbooks was selling for a nice price, so I listed it along with two other used copies. I priced it $1 cheaper than the lowest price offered, but within an hour both sellers had changed their prices to $.01 and $.02 cheaper than mine. I reduced it two times more by $1, and each time they beat my price by a cent or two. So what I did was reduce my p…

The opposite scenario (sort of), from Michael Lewis' Liar's Poker: One day earlier in his career Dall was in the market to buy (borrow) 50 million dollars. He checked around and found the money market was 4 per cent-4.25 per cent, which meant he could buy (borrow) at 4.25 per cent or sell (lend) at 4 per cent. When he actually tried to buy 50 million dollars at 4.25 per cent, however, the market moved to 4.25 per cen…

I imagine there is a lot of money to be made on Amazon using this Salomon bond trader technique of simply putting a finger on the pulse of the market.

In calculus terms, it would be like taking a derivative of the Amazon marketplace and operating on different rules than most or all buyers and sellers on the marketplace.

The trick is minimizing your risk and making sure to adhere to Amazon's terms. [Does the scenario in the grandparent comment go against Amazon's terms I wonder?]

Re: Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

#143
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Them too. Both involve "selling something you don't own" (the underlying security), a point disputed in the post I was replying to.

I don't see how writing naked puts involves selling. They involve buying, only.

All buying involve the counterpart selling. How can you buy something that isn't sold?

Re: Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

#144
post #143
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see how writing naked puts involves selling. They involve buying, only.

All buying involve the counterpart selling. How can you buy something that isn't sold?

Oh, but in naked puts the seller of the underlying assets (i.e. the buyer of the put) calls the shots. If they don't want to sell, they don't have to sell. And the writer of the put only ever has to put up at most the strike price of the put.

So no unlimited risks there.

Re: Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

#145

Automatic pricing is super common these days, even on more expensive things than books. I'm actually working on a startup called shopobot.com that wants to help people use the volatility to their advantage. We see rapid $50-100 swings on things like SLRs, so it's actually pretty significant. Ironically our site is down right now because we're based on Amazon's web services. Karma? :)

That actually sounds pretty awesome. Didn't some of those CSE's like MySimon used to have a graph of pricing over time as well? Any way I can get an invite code for Shopobot?

Sure! Just drop me an email (it's in my profile) and I'll hook you up with an invite code.
Post reply on HN