Live data from Hacker News

Humans are more closely related than we commonly think

scientificamerican.com

141–142 of 142 posts

Re: Humans are more closely related than we commonly think

#141
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had heard a different theory, that this may be a mythological explanation on why humans don't have a penile bone like many common farm animals at that time (with 'rib' being a mistranslation of a more vague 'bone'). This would also make more symbolic sense, as a penile bone would be more obviously related to creation than a rib.

Do you know this is actually a mistranslation from Hebrew, or are you just repeating an urban legend?

Image search for הצלע pretty much gives rib (and rib cuts). On the other hand, it's unclear that all of the many biblical references to feet are meant literally as pedal extremities.

Re: Humans are more closely related than we commonly think

#142
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had heard a different theory, that this may be a mythological explanation on why humans don't have a penile bone like many common farm animals at that time (with 'rib' being a mistranslation of a more vague 'bone'). This would also make more symbolic sense, as a penile bone would be more obviously related to creation than a rib.

Do you know this is actually a mistranslation from Hebrew, or are you just repeating an urban legend?

I might well be perpetuating an urban legend.

Edit: seems that there is some theory advanced by real biblical scholars, but it also seems that it is highly unlikely to be true:

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/god-didn-t-use-adam-s-penis-b...

Post reply on HN