Live data from Hacker News

You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

qntm.org

141–150 of 164 posts

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What technique is this? I am unaware of any Office of Decades charged with deciding precisely what constitutes the sole definition of "decade".

> I am unaware of any Office of Decades charged with deciding precisely what constitutes the sole definition of "decade" ISO 8601 defines what a 'decade' is. I mean you're free to ignore it of course, like you're free to say March has 34 days if you want... but you may have trouble communicating with people and integrating with existing systems.

8601's definition of a decade is somewhat different from common parlance. They're using it only to mean "the first digit of a two-digit year", and doesn't really apply it beyond that. If you stick to only that definition of a decade, you're going to have communication problems with human beings.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#143
post #2

> your name for the thirteenth month is questionable In my plan for twelve 30-day months, I intended to call the leftover 5/6 days "Etcember", for et cetera. :P (This submission appears to be a riff on the classic "Programming Language Checklist": https://www.famicol.in/language_checklist.html )

Which in turn is a riff on the "spam solutions" checklist: https://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt

Linked at the end of TFA.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#144
post #89

> ( ) planetary-scale engineering is impractical I find your lack of vision disturbing. Given that we likely need planetary-scale engineering anyway in the next 50-100 years, getting a few asteroids to nudge the earth’s orbit a bit over a long period of time isn’t that much of a stretch. With asteroid mining it might even pay for itself. Note: I didn’t do any calculations but over millions of years we’ll need to stab…

"I find your lack of vision disturbing."

Author does not lack vision: https://qntm.org/destroy

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#145
post #87
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well that's just a matter of time. I posit that given sufficient time for technology to develop, anything can be practically engineered.

If one combines theory of evolution and biological rhythms, then planetary scale engineering would be a drastic health effect.

I doubt there's going to be any issues if we made days longer by 1.46% so there would be 360 days in a year rather than 365.25.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#146

> ( ) by that logic, 2000 was the final year of the Nineties I'm annoyed by this argument, which came up again at the start of this year in dumb Twitter discussions about whether 2020 marks the beginning of a new decade. 2000 was not the final year of the Nineties. 2000 was the final year of the second millennium, and of the 20th century, and of the tenth decade of the 20th century. The Nineties were the years 1990-1…

And yet people will say that 2000 is the beginning of the millenium, and 2020 is the beginning of a decade, because colloquially it's easier and understandable. And no amount of begging, pleading, or berating will change that (although it might get you punched in the face). That pope Gregory XIII neglected to include a year 0 in his calendar doesn't have to condemn us to suffer the mental gymnastics in our daily live…

That is the real rub. It is like the word 'hacker'. No amount of 'but it really means' will change that. It is like the Mandela effect. People see and hear and remember what they want, but reality can be very different. But they will still go about their day with the 'wrong way'. Life will be just fine with something like this being 'wrong'.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#147

I like the solar hijri calendar (not to be confused with the lunar hijri). Better than anno domini would be a anno mundi system, but to make a new scientific anno mundi system rather than the old way, due directly to the Earth going around the Sun, because that is how the year is considered, so to count years starting from that, too. For time keeping, use local time based on mean solar time, with no daylight saving t…

. . . anno mundi . . . ante meridiem . . . :P

I admit that the abbrevation may be confusing, but the numbers would hopefully be large enough to avoid this confusion.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#148
post #51

Am I supposed to be able to select an option?

The premise is that this would be pasted in its entirety into a reply to a usenet or listserv post, with the text of the appropriate line- or lines- modified from "( )" to "(x)". The implication is that amateur calendarists, who do not fully grasp the enormity of the task, frequently post to this list with proposals for a new calendar. The regular contributors to this list see so many ill-conceived proposals that the…

What is the newsgroup for writing calendar proposals?

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#149
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Months are fine. Leap years are fine. It’s leap seconds that annoy me.

> Leap years are fine. It’s leap seconds that annoy me. The implementation of leap seconds is obviously worse than the implementation of leap years, though. (This might make more sense if leap seconds had come first...) In a leap year, February 28 is followed by February 29, a day that doesn't ordinarily exist. It has the same weight as any other day. If you had a dentist appointment on the 29th, then on March 3rd pe…

I think I have seen it written as "23:59:60" during a leap second. In Unix time, you could code it as the previous second but +1 billion nanoseconds, or as the next second but -1 billion nanoseconds (if you use this option, the number of nanoseconds must be a signed type).

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A decade is any interval of ten years, so all years are the start of a decade, except for the nine years at the end of the universe. Which explains why it is so difficult to make a reservation at Milliways.

> so all years are the start of a decade This isn't the standard technical meaning of 'decade'.

Says who? I routinely refer to something I did a long time ago as "two decades ago", whether the current year ends in zero, one, or something else.
Post reply on HN