Live data from Hacker News

Windows98 Running in the Browser

copy.sh

141–150 of 271 posts

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#141

Back when the system settings could be reached with less clicks, were organised in a logical way and didn't use most of the screen as white-space.

Only if you use just a mouse. Usually I'll just hit a windows key, type a keyword related to whatever I'm looking for and it's there.

Sometimes... if you put in just the right number of characters so it doesn't search the web instead... but then, it is often the first result even! No, wait, it moved just before I clicked it, fuck.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#142
post #64

Hypothetical question: If you where a program running in the VM how would you know if you are in one?

There's ways. Detecting whether tools like VMWare/Virtualbox are installed, whether certain drivers are installed, checking the hardware listings etc. etc. Malware is quite a good study subject about this question. There's a lot of malware that won't run if it's in a virtual machine to avoid researchers from testing it inside one.

So, running a Windows VM inside a Windows VM is the safest option?

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#143
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yes. in my opinion though, windows 2000 was the pinnacle. it had the user experience of windows 98 but was also a lot more stable.

Non-NT Windows didn't support memory protection. That's the main reason why it was much more stable. Programming on Windows 98 was a nightmare. If you, for example, went too far with your `i++` you could've crashed the system.

That's not actually true. It was far more nuanced than this.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#144
post #108

Does anybody have a reasonable explanation why windows 10 requires a SSD and so much ram? I wish a kernel engineer could give a good answer to that question. One side of the answer could be that the software that is bigger, but honestly that doesn't explain everything. I wish somebody could confirm Wirth's law is real and that there are valid example of it.

Does it require an SSD? I'm pretty sure my desktop pc doesn't have one and its running win 10?

It doesn't require an SSD in the strictest sense of the word, but it is developed with the strong assumption that you have at least something as fast as an SSD, so the experience of running it on a spinning rust disk is an exercise in patience.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was very usable. Performed incredibly well. And was boring as hell. I think it's the latter issue that drove it to it's doom.

Management says: Easily usable interface with almost no confusion: bad, looks ugly. Barely usable interface with barely discernible elements: good, looks modern.

I wish it were only management that thought that way, but it seems like a lot of developers genuinely believe it too.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not loading is surely preferable.

Didn't some ad server serving msn homepage managed to be exploited to serve malware to old IE versions. So the hapless admin who needs to download a file off the web (with no other browsers installed, and no firewall) would open IE and boom, exploit!

https://blog.malwarebytes.com/threat-analysis/2016/01/msn-ho...

Is this what you're referring to?

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#147
post #79

Wow, what a flashback! This was the OS I actually grew up with. I remember being 3 or 4 years old and playing Carnivores 2 on my Dad's Windows 98 PC. Even the slowness and unresponsiveness is there, just like I remember! Yeah...this was the golden age. So much hope and so much optimism for what could be in regards to technology and what it would allow for the general population. I still think we're not there, but we…

> this was the golden age. So much hope and so much optimism for what could be Funny that because I grew up in the 80s and for me the golden age was 10 to 15 years earlier and I saw Windows 98 as the decline. There was so much variety and experimentation in the 80s, and so much excitement too when GUIs first started appearing on home computers. There was also much more diversity in the computing landscape with differ…

I belong to a similar generation and for me actually only Windows and macOS map to the feelings that I enjoyed while using those 16 bit machines and small flirt with BeOS and QNX demo floppies.

For many years I looked forward to GNU/Linux settling into one stack and offering a multimedia experience like the Amiga, Atari and Acorn, but that was in vain in the kingdom of CLI and forking projects.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#148
post #127

Back when the system settings could be reached with less clicks, were organised in a logical way and didn't use most of the screen as white-space.

To me the omnibox is the only way I know how access certain settings. I have no idea where they are located in this maze of categories and subcategories.

Amen! The Lord giveth, and the Lord taketh away.

For me, without the OmniBox Windows would be unusable by now. I consider Windows 2000 to be peak Windows UX. It was all downhill from there.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only if you use just a mouse. Usually I'll just hit a windows key, type a keyword related to whatever I'm looking for and it's there.

Sometimes... if you put in just the right number of characters so it doesn't search the web instead... but then, it is often the first result even! No, wait, it moved just before I clicked it, fuck.

And they keep screwing with the right registry incantation to turn off the web search crap.

If you're on 2004, it's HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows, DisableSearchBoxSuggestions = DWORD(1)

If you're on 1909, it's HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Search CortanaConsent = DWORD(0), and BingSearchEnabled = DWORD(0)

Post reply on HN