Earlier quoted context omitted.
We don't allow our mail to be seized and read without warrant, why should our other data be susceptible? Netflix already had a secure system with their original business model of mailing you the content. Finally, allowing advertisers to profile us based on our browsing data is one step before allowing the police to do so as well. Maybe it's the same step.
But what about interdiction? What if the CIA swaps the directors cut dvd for the theatrical version and you never learn deckard was a replicant?
Good point. I think there's always a certain element of trust here--the law is more important than the implementation sometimes.