Not a great look. This line: > The actions that we took over the weekend are causing people to question if we are still committed to these values. We absolutely are and I will explain. Is basically saying, "What we did actually exemplifies our values", or maybe saying, "Well actually, our values..." Combined with the complete lack of acknowledgement of wrongdoing and not addressing their initial online response at al…
Lack of acknowledgement? They reduced the penalties, both for the casters and the player...
Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
141–150 of 179 posts
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#142Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Scanning social media, I haven't seen a single gaming influencer say it's a sufficient statement: https://twitter.com/search?q=filter%3Averified%20https%3A%2F... The contrarian viewpoint is "what were you expecting?" in which case the reply is "an actual apology."
Anecdotally, most those I know, while unhappy about it, are continuing to play. While I don’t think people are going to defend this, I doubt this will meaningfully affect them in the long-term. It’s easy for companies, after some backlash by a loud yet small crowd on social media, to blacklist a certain high profile individual out of risk. It’s hard for that same group to make a difference against an organization as…
I've seen others in StarCraft related subreddits share similar feelings. I agree the majority seem to still want the game and community to continue on as is.
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#144This part descends to absurdity: > Every Voice Matters, and we strongly encourage everyone in our community to share their viewpoints in the many places available to express themselves. However, the official broadcast needs to be about the tournament and to be a place where all are welcome. In support of that, we want to keep the official channels focused on the game. One of their core values is "every voice matters"…
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#145In fact, the language used here, about openness and 'feeling welcome' (cf hurt feelings) comes close to the CCP phrasebook. CCP, to remind you, has publicly stated that opinions on China affairs from foreigners and utterings that make people feel unwelcome ot hurt feelings, are not free speech.
HK people are fighting for their freedom and their lives. They need public support in the West to have a chance. Blizzard sanctioning them or others for this shows abundently clear on which side this company is!
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reddit has to make a lot of decisions, some were soon after she joined. Not sure CEOs of social media company get involved in making that decision personally, rather than name people who would -- Pao might be an exception, though. From all the subreddits that were closed, I’d be hard-pressed to name one that I felt contributed to free speech.
> contributed to free speech. What does it mean to "contribute to" free speech?
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#147I want to be clear: our relationships in China had no influence on our decision
Makes me feel really positive about Blizzard
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#148I might believe this, if the American team who made the exact same statement (pro-Hong Kong) in a virtually identical context (on a stream with shoutcasters) had received the same punishment. They didn’t. They didn’t receive any punishment, they were immediately moved on to the next match. So, Blizzard is not acting any anything resembling consistently on this matter. Some voices matter more than others; in this case…
Re: Regarding Last Weekend’s Hearthstone Grandmasters Tournament
#149a) what was said in the statement, and Blizzard's statement made on Chinese social media at the time, and
b) the lack of discipline on American tournament players who also protested.
Furthermore a written statement is nothing compared to a video, where vocal intonation and body language communicates a lot.
Bottom line, releasing this statement will only intensify criticism that Blizzard is "Lawfully Evil".
The irony is that Blizzard's fanbase are 'heroes' who overcome evil in their games. Blizzard's actions are the very antithesis of their player bases' psychology.
This isn't over, and with Blizzcon around the corner, I predict escalation and Blizzcon being a total PR disaster.