Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a very important point. Individuals should be able to censor aspects of their own medical records. It's not just mental illness. Getting regularly tested for STDs/AIDS or having evidence that could be interpreted as a pre-existing condition are other aspects of a person's medical history that can cause problems with potential employers or insurers.
This goes back to the central thesis of the article: that interference from non-physicians (i.e. insurers, billers) are destroying the usefulness of notes. Physicians are bound by both a professional duty and oath as well as legal liability to keep your medical information in the strictest of confidence. But it is nearly impossible to know in advance when a particular piece of medical information will become importan…
I think there's a big difference between third parties interfering with those notes for some profit motive, and the person who those notes are about interfering for privacy reasons, no matter how misguided.