Live data from Hacker News

Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

theverge.com

141–150 of 150 posts

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#141
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I come from a very right-leaning area. I was quite surprised to find that everyone I knew supported the daily killing and torture of Jews... because that is what Nazis do, right? I was also quite surprised to hear that my community wants to take away rights from black people, which I heard in a radio ad not so long ago. The left has its equal share of hobgoblins.

> I was also quite surprised to hear that my community wants to take away rights from black people, which I heard in a radio ad not so long ago Have you checked this? What's their opinion on, for example, Black Lives matter?

Most of them don't have the education to know the definition of a false equivalence.

That you can seriously entertain Republicans would remove black freedoms if not for Black Lives Matter just turned this thread into one where you can rant away without my participation.

I'm learning to walk away from hate.

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#142

This is a classic example of shifting the blame. Yes, he admits that facebook spent too much time trying to minimise the problem. And indeed they did. But it's not only the misinformation that is the problem, facebook itself is at the heart of the problem. They are one of many, albeit facebook being on the more influential side, platforms through which misinformation is spread. And of course education is the main han…

> We thought the Internet would bring prosperity and an explosion of knowledge growth.

Sheesh, this is centuries long rinse-repeat with press, radio, TV ...

You do get that, but more better advertising, and incidental worldview shaping, is what you get that really matters.

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#143

After the Trump election where I interestingly enough found myself agreeing with a lot of the critique of the current political system coming from both Sanders and Trump even though I would normally consider myself part of the liberal political spectrum (pro-abortion, against the death sentence, couldn't care less if gay people get married etc) I started digging into things I had taken for granted such as Breibart be…

Exactly. You and I have gone down the same rabbit hole and realized that its not as clear cut as they claim. The pompousness and shaming has to end in order for us all to come together. Blaming everything on this false spectre of "misinformation" is nonsense. It's a veiled attempt to treat everyone who disagree with you as stupid.

Jumped this shark some time ago.

Divisiveness is the number one enemy to personal freedom and free societies.

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#144
post #55

Oh please. The headline might as well have been: We need to protect people from information and ideas we don't agree with. Freedom of speech is not just about speech, its about ideas. Nobody should ever be deemed the arbiter of truth. Not Facebook, not the government, not anyone. Decentralize the social networks. Let everyone speak, even the bad people. Realize that you actually make the problem worse by suppressing…

Saying "everyone should speak" actually means "everyone should speak according to their purchasing power in the market" right now - so I think your premise, while well meaning, is not realistic. Having liars with big pockets broadcast lies (propaganda) works very effectively, no "black market suppression of the truth" is needed to weaponize bad ideas.

Our attention is a limited resource. How do you propose to arbitrate access to this limited resource except through the price mechanism? Some kind of attention lottery?

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if the majority of those voters are opposed to democracy itself, and vote for candidates who promise to take away votes from people they don't like, or establish a theocracy? "America isn't and shouldn't be a democracy" is a common Republican talking point. This has happened in Poland and Hungary and its darn close to happening in the United States.

Not sure what you’re implying with your statement about the Republican talking point. The point of the point is the U.S. was designed to be a Constitutional Republic which isn’t a democracy. The Constitutional Republic is designed to protect the rights and freedoms of the individual via the Constitution and bill of rights. If by Democracy one is referring solely to majority rule, then protection against individual ri…

This is exactly the talking point I mean. It uses weasel words to trick people into believing that democracy is bad.

Saying "the US isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional republic", is like saying "Garfield isn't a cat, he's a cartoon and a vertebrate". None of these things are mutually exclusive.

Democracy: government where political power ultimately comes from the popular vote. The opposite of democracy is autocracy.

Republic: government where the state belongs to the people and is run for their benefit. The opposite of republic is monarchy.

Constitutional: government with ground rules for how the levers of power work that nobody is allowed to break. The opposite of constitutional government is absolute government.

You can have government on any of these axes. Being a constitutional republic doesn't preclude being a democracy. Contrast the United States and North Korea. Both are constitutional republics (fundamental law, no monarch), but one is democratic (all votes matter), and the other is autocratic (only one vote matters).

Democracy does NOT mean "absolute rule by a mere majority". Republicans lie and weasel to try to get people to think this so that they can say that democracy is bad and we should accept minority rule instead (aka, autocracy)

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> To fight fake news, we'd have to go to the sources True. But many people do not check sources and do not want sources. The more sources you link, the more likely your message is ignored or downvoted or considered spam. Some comment section tools even refuse posts with too many links. The EU fights against sources. Macron vows to tighten media control because 'fake news threatens democracy' https://www.rt.com/news/4…

It's not the money that makes bad reporting - its the direct tying of eyeballs to monetary reward. That incentivizes creating of very clickbaity, meme-like reporting.

Any content is quickly recognizable as what it is unless it looks serious and not clickbaity and was created to promote lies.

E.g. the Yugoslav war lies and the Iraq war lies and Libya war lies or Syria war lies and Russia "war" lies promoted by certain governments that where published by all "serious" mainstream media to justify and promote war; the worst of all crimes. Every war is a war crime.

Hague Tribunal Exonerates Slobodan Milosevic Again https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/12/07/hague-trib...

KOSOVO German 2008 documentary-It began with a lie PART 1of5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_scokGJga8c

Judgment! 1/3 - The Bosnian 'Death Camp' Accusation: An Expose https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xox7TR11evI

The Iraq War - TOTAL LIES and TOTAL PROOF - Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNFDXSKh17I

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#147
post #40
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess should have being more specific as in educate people to identify misinformation campaigns. The alternative of giving government powers to sensor information looks even less reasonable.

Education works, except that the whole system relies on the same propaganda tricks. Governments use education to spread ideology and they would never properly teach people about their tricks, they want people to believe in all the bullshit, get used to the system, participate in the system, obey it, they don't want to prepare dissidents at schools.

good point I guess it up to people to organize and not rely on gov. for this

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nah. This conflagratory term "fake news" deliberately muddles "things that aren't very important" with "lies told by officials". I think the second needs to be a condition of public office. You deliberately lie, or show a pattern of not giving a shit about the truth, pack your bags and get a private sector job. Conversely and perversely, the varied institutions of public office seem to protect politicians' speech. Th…

But who would be the arbitraitor who decides when you have lied so much you have to leave?

I'm not saying there are quick and easy answers here, just that even agreeing a very high burden of evidence is better than... this.

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True as long as the representative democracy doesn’t infringe on the individual’s constitutional rights. That’s where the democracy bit gives way to the judicial branch. Of coarse with a politicized court you’re right back to the ills of a democracy.

What you’re saying is still true in a constitutional monarchy. Being a republic or democracy doesn’t matter. Its the constitutional part that’s important.

Republic and Democracy are not exclusive. There is no such thing as "being republic or democracy". It's really simple:

Monarchy: yes king

Republic: no king

Democracy: yes votes

Autocracy: no votes

Constitutional: yes constitution

Absolute: no constitution

You can have these in any combination.

Re: Stamos says the US must ‘come together to protect’ democracy from misinformation

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Canada there is a law where you can't lie on the news. It's worked pretty well and I can at least stand the news programs we have. I also think you're a bit too naive. Without proper governance look at what is happening in america. America from the outside believes climate change is a hoax because republicans are bought. No one is willing to go against the establishment and make laws to stop this when they're clea…

Who gets to determine if you lie? What constitutes a lie? Can I say that the holocaust never happened, if that is what I actually believe? How about global warming. Besides it only takes a marginally more more skilled speaker to get the same result and say nothing at all that can be stated as a direct lie.

No, if you're a news organization you can't say things because you believe it. That's the point.
Post reply on HN