What can I do about climate change?

Locally harvested? Great! But likely not the bulk of supply.

Supermarket honey? Transported from Goodness Knows Where -- very likely China or Chile, where the bees are intensively fed... (you guessed it!) sugar! That's why the honey is so flavourless, not to mention the Carbon footprint of all those honey-kilometres.

Bees are almost as intensively farmed as anything else, and, while the effects and outcomes are nowhere near as severe as other forms of intensive husbandry, the honey is not necessarily the pure and innocent product you might think it is.

Do you need to use that much soap? Do you need to keep the lights on everywhere? Do you need to use a tumble-dryer or could you let your clothes air dry instead? Do you need that shiny new phone or is your current one good for another couple of years?

Yes, all of these are absolutely small things individually, but put together and done by many people, it does make a difference.

A big thing you can do individually is to Buy Less Stuff. Be happy with the TV you have, don't change your wardrobe just because of fickle changing fashion nonsense, don't replace stuff that works just fine. Break the cycle of consumerism. Don't support the polluting corporations.

The very biggest thing you can do is to be politically active. Vote for pro-environment politicians and parties, be part of political initiatives.

Nobody needs a brand new coffee table, when there are plenty of perfectly decent ones for sale second-hand.

Not necessarily and that's certainly not settled. Kuhns paradigms is another way to think about it than Poppers idea of building knowledge as bricks that create a house. I am not convinced knowledge works the way we normally think about it.

Furthermore "climate science" is not actually following the scientific principles as it's not falsifiable for obvious reasons.

"Climate science" is metascience in the sense that it builds on and interprets data which has its own set of issues besides the issues with data modeling.

There are plenty of examples of mistakes, false predictions, cheating with the data etc. that anyone who wants to have an opinion on this should be really really really careful how much we actually can demonstrate vs. how much is speculated. Just taking it on faith that the scientific community is in agreement about a lot of the details is simply misguided.

There are plenty of theories around natural fluctuations even big ones like this (and bigger) so the trick IMO is not discussion whether humans are affecting it as we can't change that and will not change that, in fact, if we did it probably would lead to more death than the consequences of flooding and it certainly will lead to more poor people without any means to deal with the ever-changing climate.

You and others seem to be of the impression that nature is fundamentally friendly and safe towards us and we are destroying it, my position is that nature is fundamentally hostile and dangerous and that we are using technology to be safer from it. Yes, that has consequences but I take those any day compared to becoming paralyzed by trying to solve a problem that is many times more complex than any other things we have ever solved before. CopX is a great example of just how little our global initiatives help.

Flying less, eating less meat isn't the solution to the problem, more actual science, engineering and entrepreneurship and making people richer so they start caring about their close environment is.

https://www.britannica.com/science/Little-Ice-Age

These people always have to sell fear. The climate change fearmongering is no different than the failed malthusian prophecy of the 19th century. Or the global cooling fearmongering the BBC and much of the media were peddling before "global warming" became the "cool" thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling

If the BBC was truly worried about climate change, why don't they shut down their operation? How many kids, vacations, cars, etc are created because BBC exists? Why not follow their own rules?

BBC should lead by example if they truly believed the nonsense they spout everyday.