Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wasn't the way they did billing, it was just an option. One they've removed. I get it, I'm just saying it cost them some money.
I totally get that. I don't dispute that . But if you must choose between "please sir, can I have some more?" and controlling your own revenue destiny, it is clear why some would choose the later. Would you want to be beholden to AWS' whims? You might as well be a Walmart supplier at that point, constantly dragged out to Bentonville having to make your case for every penny of your costs. Amazon has proven its model (…
Re: Elastic files for an IPO
#141I had already acknowledged that though.