Live data from Hacker News

“Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

robertheaton.com

141–150 of 161 posts

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#141
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google indeed doesn't sell info to other people. (It does collect it though.)

Is there a definitive list anywhere of what Chrome collects and where it goes? There have been rumours forever, but I'm interested in verifiable facts.

If you're logged in, which Chrome strongly encourages, it's your entire browsing history. See the URL above.

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#142
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google indeed doesn't sell info to other people. (It does collect it though.)

It collects it for the purpose of building a better advertising profile of you- so it can make more money from ads. It’s still using my data about me and making money off of it.

Not to complain about downmodding - I can afford to loose the karma - but this threads a little unusual in terms of comments summing up Google's business model (which most people on HN should be aware of) going from highly upmodded to highly downmodded.

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I realize this is bad, but what happens to the user data exactly? I mean can someone here paint the bleakest, most dystopian possible use or future?

A lot of people focus on how this information is used by advertisers, which can be a problem, but in my opinion the bigger issue is how data brokers are starting to act like completely unregulated and sometimes highly inaccurate credit reports.

do you mean the data is actually used to determine the credit of a business/individual?

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#145
post #80

Dangit - I just installed it yesterday to block Twitter's annoying timeline additions ("So-and-so liked such-and-such") which don't honor the account's word filter/blacklist. Any alternatives out there that are better?

Dark Reader (which generates dark themes dynamically) added support for static CSS so that style sheets can be migrated http://darkreader.org/blog/stylish/

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you dont want the heavy handed solution that NoScript provides, i would suggest "uBlock Matrix".

There are two, similar, though different, extensions. uBlock origin is a dedicated, quite-good, low-fuss, ad blocker. uMatrix is a much more general, very powerful, though somewhat fussy, general Web capabilities manager. If you don't mind fiddling with sites periodically, it's very strongly recommended, but for user populations who don't do this or grasp technology poorly, it will require some fairly close managing,…

> for user populations who don't do this or grasp technology poorly, it will require some fairly close managing

I would never have imagined installing it for non-technical users, but one was interested in giving it a try and had no problem. They even said they really liked learning how the web worked (uMatrix shows a grid (the matrix) of hosts and functionality, such as CSS, images, scripts, media, etc.). So I gave it to another non-technical user, and they also like it.

Both have been surprised to see the number of domains that contribute to one webpage (most users assume it's all from the domain they typed into the URL field), and how often Facebook, Twitter, Google Analytics, and other tracking domains show up in that matrix.

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#148
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a definitive list anywhere of what Chrome collects and where it goes? There have been rumours forever, but I'm interested in verifiable facts.

If you're logged in, which Chrome strongly encourages, it's your entire browsing history. See the URL above.

Thanks, but what I'm really trying to ask here is what a vanilla Chrome installation does. If someone just installs Chrome, leaves all settings as defaults, and doesn't opt in to anything, what data is being sent back to the mothership? I've never managed to find a convincing answer to that question.

Re: “Stylish” browser extension steals all your internet history

#149
I've been lucky enough to have never had an extension installed when it was sold, so I don't know that this isn't already the case, but if it isn't, I believe it should be: Whenever an extension changes hands (is transfered to another account), the user should be notified in the same way they would be if it requested new permissions. Along with a rule that accounts are non-transferable, of course.
Post reply on HN