Thanks for adding this:
I don't see evidence to support that conspiracy theory.I see you are concerned with other comments here and elsewhere arguing a conspiracy of some sort to get the author banned. I have no opinion one way or the other on that specific accusation. I also don't think it is germane to my claims in this thread.
I was remarking that "Due Process" the specific legal term associated with the how the legal system deals with accusations, was designed to avoid the situation the author writes about where he asserts he was not told who is accusers were, what he was accused of, or given an opportunity to refute those accusations. This works because it removes information asymmetry that can be exploited by the attacker or the attacked. An recent example of how this can be exploited is the story of a venture capitalist who was accused of sexual harassment anonymously by someone who turned out to be a competitor[1].
In a system where, as part of the process, an accuser and accused are made aware of the real identities of each other this would never has passed the first examination.
If such a process were in place in this particular case, and the code of conduct violation was the one you cited, then the email to the author would have said
"These {insert identities} have accused you of failing
to enforce the code of conduct elements {identified paragraphs}
in the following situations {links to exchanges between author
and community}. We would like to hear your side of this
before we render a judgement."
And they would get back the authors point of view, then they might ask the accuser or the author for more information, and then they would render some judgement and an explanation of why they ruled the way they did so that in the future people would either recognize that it wasn't an issue or that it was and to not do it.
Processes are like programs or math proofs, if you do each of the steps in the right order you get the right answer regardless of the intent or opinion of the people carrying out the process.
[1] http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/07/25/lawsuit-sexual-harassm...