I was involved with one of the bigger ICO right at the beginning of the ICO craze. I had pretty regular conversations with the project founder and was in talks to become the dev evangelist. The project had raised ~$5 million in ETH (this is when ETH was trading around $80). Despite the fact that this project had raised a crazy amount of money the whole project was being conceptualized and coded by a single 23 old guy…
I don't know the degree of complexity or technical ambition of the project you were a part of, but it's not unusual for a 23 year old guy to write most of the Ethereum app. In fact, that's probably the reason why most ICOs are a scam, there's an insanely low barrier to building a proof of concept. The boilerplate is like 15 lines. When it's so easy that any 20 year old backend dev can issue a token, you should alread…
Ding ding ding, winner! So many of these just have no point in being as companies, let alone as a token.
At The STC, we're going to end sex trafficking in just like Apple and Amazon (and now Google and Spotify) ended music piracy. To operate, we must be an extrajurisdictional company which makes cryptocurrencies a useful way to get investment and pay dividends. But we're not going to issue tokens -- only shares. Ethereum will help us keep track of share ownership and allow easy trading, but we're not a "blockchain company".
I hope we see a new wave of post-ICO companies using these technologies as a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. We're probably leaving money on the table by saying that and not hyping up tokens and tech. Oh well, we're going to create a valuable business instead.