Live data from Hacker News

DeepText: Facebook's text understanding engine

code.facebook.com

141–142 of 142 posts

Re: DeepText: Facebook's text understanding engine

#141
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People in the general public don't really have a clear idea about what Facebook, Google, and Amazon are doing. Still, most people I know are vaguely aware that there's something creepy going on. They aren't really comfortable with Facebook, Inc owning their digital social life, but they rely on it because of the obvious network effect. Try asking someone "hey, you know Facebook use a lot of state-of-the-art technolog…

>People in the general public don't really have a clear idea about what Facebook, Google, and Amazon are doing. But neither do you really, right ? Sure, you may have a better idea than them of what's technically feasible, but the general HN consensus on the motives, values and internal decision-making process at these companies ("always assume the worst from them, they're optimizing for money!") is in my experience (…

True, neither do I... because what they do with content is secret.

I don't think it's nerd-bias... it's more that many of my friends and acquaintances who aren't nerds are still instinctively skeptical of large corporations and the power structures they create with respect to privacy.

As for what people in general think, we really should ask around. I heard about a consumer trust survey where Facebook's trust was very low, and based on how I see people relate to Facebook, I'm not surprised at all.

I think we ought to be suspicious and critical of corporations that collect large amounts of private and personal data, just as we ought to be so of government surveillance (of course they're inseparable).

Re: DeepText: Facebook's text understanding engine

#142
post #96
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In my opinion the bigger problem is, when people are not aware that they're in a bubble. They existed, even before social media and internet searches. E.G. when I was a kid/teen, I got most of the information about the world from one local news paper and one evening news show on tv. Yes, their "newsfeed" wasn't generated by algorithms. But still, it's someone that decided for me what is relevant and what not. Nowaday…

Common man is brought up within the bubble of their parent's beliefs. Intelligent man breaks out of that bubble, once he find it too constraining. Unintelligent man does not. Unintelligent man also have trouble identifying bubbles. Earth provide opportunities for success for both men. In the long run, one of them will dominate the other.

Darwin speak better. Darwin know grammar.
Post reply on HN